Northern States Power Co. v. US

Decision Date31 August 2000
Citation224 F.3d 1361
Parties(Fed. Cir. 2000) NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. 99-5096 DECIDED:
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Federal Circuit

Before MAYER, Chief Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents the same basic issue as Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company v. United States, Nos. 99-5138, 39, 40, decided simultaneously herewith: Whether an electric utility may maintain a damage suit based on the government's alleged breach of a 1983 contract with it by which the government agreed, beginning no later than January 1, 1998, to dispose of the nuclear waste that the utility had generated, or was required first to file an administrative claim with the contracting officer under the contract's disputes provision. In Maine Yankee, the United States Court of Federal Claims denied the government's motion to dismiss the complaint, holding that the utility could maintain the suit, a decision we today affirm.

In the present case another judge of that court held that the utility was required first to proceed administratively under the disputes clause of the contract, and dismissed the complaint on the government's motion. We reverse.

I

The background facts are set forth in our opinion in Maine Yankee, and need not be repeated in detail here.

Because of concerns over the disposal of nuclear waste accumulating at nuclear power plants, Congress in the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 ("the Act"), 42 U.S.C. 10101-10270 (1994), authorized the Secretary of the Department of Energy ("the Department") to enter into contracts with utilities for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel ("SNF") and high-level radioactive waste. See 42 U.S.C. 10222(a)(1) (1994). The Act required that all such contracts "shall provide that" the Department will dispose of the waste "beginning not later than January 31, 1998." Id. 10222(a)(5)(B).

The Department promulgated a Standard Contract for Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, 10 C.F.R. 961.11 (1983). That contract required the utilities to pay a one-time fee, based on the amount of electricity generated prior to April 7, 1983, and an ongoing fee based on the amount of electricity generated thereafter. As the Act required, the contract (article II) obligated the Department to take title to, transport, and dispose of the nuclear waste beginning "not later than January 31, 1998."

The contract also contains several provisions dealing with delays, remedies and disputes. It provides that in case of "any delay in the delivery, acceptance or transport of SNF . . . to or by DOE caused by circumstances within the reasonable control of either the Purchaser or DOE or their respective contractors or suppliers, the charges and schedules specified by this contract will be equitably adjusted to reflect any estimated additional costs incurred by the party not responsible for or contributing to the delay" (article IX.B); and that "[e]xcept as otherwise provided in this contract, any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under this contract which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Contracting Officer" (article XVI).

The appellee Northern States Power Company (Northern States) is an electric utility that has nuclear power...

To continue reading

Request your trial
28 cases
  • Vt. Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Federal Circuit
    • October 1, 2012
    ...involved all the utilities that had signed the contract—the entire nuclear electric industry.”); see also N. States Power Co. v. United States, 224 F.3d 1361, 1367 (Fed.Cir.2000). The government admitted liability for its breach of the Standard Contract, and the Claims Court awarded ENVY $3......
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Teva Pharm. USA, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Federal Circuit
    • October 20, 2014
    ...States, 498 F.3d 1301, 1306 (Fed.Cir.2007) ; Perez v. Dep't of Justice, 480 F.3d 1309, 1312 (Fed.Cir.2007) ; N. States Power Co. v. United States, 224 F.3d 1361, 1367 (Fed.Cir.2000) ; Fromson v. W. Litho Plate & Supply Co., 853 F.2d 1568, 1578 (Fed.Cir.1988) (“Cases should not be cited for ......
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Teva Pharms. United States, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Federal Circuit
    • October 20, 2014
    ...States, 498 F.3d 1301, 1306 (Fed.Cir.2007); Perez v. Dep't of Justice, 480 F.3d 1309, 1312 (Fed.Cir.2007); N. States Power Co. v. United States, 224 F.3d 1361, 1367 (Fed.Cir.2000); Fromson v. W. Litho Plate & Supply Co., 853 F.2d 1568, 1578 (Fed.Cir.1988) (“Cases should not be cited for mer......
  • Alabama Power Co. v. U.S. Dept. of Energy
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • September 24, 2002
    ...regarding the completeness of the relief they afforded that explains the D.C. Circuit's decision." N. States Power Co. v. United States, 224 F.3d 1361, 1366 (Fed.Cir.2000) (internal citations Just before the Federal Circuit rendered its decisions in Maine Yankee and Northern States Power, t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT