State v. Sullivan
Decision Date | 12 July 1920 |
Docket Number | No. 21947.,21947. |
Citation | 283 Mo. 546,224 S.W. 327 |
Parties | STATE ex rel. WESTHUES, Pros. Atty., v. SULLIVAN, Secretary of State, et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Cole County; J. G. Slate, Judge.
Action by the state of Missouri, on the relation of Henry J. Westhues, prosecuting attorney of Cole county, Mo., against John L. Sullivan, Secretary of State, and Frank W. McAllister, Attorney General, in which John C. Hall and R. T. Wood, citizens and taxpayers, were allowed to intervene as plaintiffs, and Maurice J. Cassidy and others were allowed to intervene as defendants. From a judgment enjoining the defendants first named from committing any act towards accepting and filing petitions for the referendum of the Workmen's Compensation Act, defendants and the intervening defendants appeal. Reversed and petition dismissed.
Frank W. McAllister, Atty. Gen., and C. P. LeMire, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellants.
John M. Atkinson, of St. Louis, for intervening appellants.
Alroy S. Phillips and John C. Hall, both of St. Louis, Roy D. Williams, of Kansas City, D. F. Calfee, of Jefferson City, and Jesse McDonald, of St. Louis, for respondent and respondent intervener.
Under our rule 15 (198 S. W. vi) the appellant in making his brief is required, among other things, to make "a fair and concise statement of the facts of the case, without reiteration, statements of law, or argument"; and as to the respondent, under the same rule, it is said: "The respondent in his brief may adopt the statement of appellant; or, if not satisfied therewith, he shall, in a concise statement, correct any errors therein."
The appellant has filed a statement of 19 printed pages, which covers an analysis of the pleadings and evidence. Turning to respondent's brief, we find no corrections or criticism of this statement up to page 10 thereof; and under the rule we are at liberty to assume defendants' statement to this point to be a fair statement, and, as it is as concise a statement of the pleadings as we could make, we adopt it, as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Idaho State AFL-CIO v. Leroy
... ... Perhaps the leading court in the country concerning the issue in this case has been the Supreme Court of Missouri. A veritable plethora of cases have come before the courts in Missouri, and applying a rule first laid down in State ex rel. Westhues v. Sullivan, 283 Mo. 546, 224 S.W. 327 (1920), the Missouri Courts have provided for judicial review of emergency declarations, and in many cases have invalidated those emergency clauses. Westhues presented the issue by an action to enjoin the Secretary of State from filing referendum petitions on a law ... ...
-
State ex Inf. Attorney-General v. Curtis
... ... The only theory on which the emergency clause could be sustained is that the law was necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health or safety. Sec. 36, Art. 4, Constitution; State ex rel. Westhues v. Sullivan, 283 Mo. 546; Fahey v. Hackmann, 291 Mo. 351. (4) The act violates Section 28 of Article 4 of the Constitution, in that it contains more than one subject and the provisions of the act are not clearly expressed in the title. State ex inf. v. Armstrong, 286 S.W. 705; State ex rel. v. Hackmann, 292 ... ...
-
Mississippi River Fuel Corp. v. Smith
... 164 S.W.2d 370 ... MISSISSIPPI RIVER FUEL CORPORATION ET AL., Appellants, ... FORREST SMITH, State Auditor, Respondent, EVANS & HOWARD SEWER PIPE COMPANY ET AL., Appellants ... No. 37831 ... No. 37832 ... Supreme Court of Missouri ... Frank Hollingsworth, Special Judge ... AFFIRMED ... William A. Dougherty, James A. Potter, Hugh H. Sullivan and Sullivan, Reeder, Finley & Gaines for appellant, Mississippi River Fuel Corporation ... (1) The jurisdiction of these ... ...
-
First Trust Company of Lincoln v. Smith
... ... construed precisely as though it had been originally enacted ... in its amended form." State v. Hevelone, 92 ... Neb. 748, 139 N.W. 636 ... 2 ... " Where, by amendment and repeal, the words of a former ... statute or ... Stein v ... Morrison, 9 Idaho 426, 75 P. 246; State v ... Henry, 37 N.M. 536, 25 P.2d 204; State v ... Sullivan, 283 Mo. 546, 224 S.W. 327; Morgan v ... State, 51 Neb. 672, 71 N.W. 788; Travelers' Ins ... Co. v. Marshall, 124 Tex. 45, 76 S.W.2d 1007 ... ...