State v. Covington
Decision Date | 25 March 2020 |
Docket Number | SC 20198 |
Citation | 335 Conn. 212,229 A.3d 1036 |
Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
Parties | STATE of Connecticut v. Jeffrey COVINGTON |
Naomi T. Fetterman, with whom was Aaron Romano, Bloomfield, for the appellant (defendant).
Melissa L. Streeto, senior assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were Patrick Griffin, state's attorney, and John P. Doyle and Seth Garbarsky, senior assistant state's attorneys, for the appellee (state).
Robinson, C.J., and Palmer, McDonald, D'Auria, Mullins, Kahn and Ecker, Js.
In this certified appeal, the defendant, Jeffrey Covington, claims that the Appellate Court improperly affirmed his conviction for carrying a pistol or revolver without a permit in violation of General Statutes § 29-35 (a).1 In particular, he argues that the state failed to present sufficient evidence that the firearm he was alleged to have been carrying had a barrel length of less than twelve inches. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the Appellate Court.
The Appellate Court's opinion sets forth the following relevant facts, which the jury reasonably could have found at trial. "At or about 8 p.m., on March 24, 2014, the defendant was operating an automobile that was owned by his friend, Derek Robinson. When the defendant drove Robinson's automobile away from the intersection of Whalley Avenue and Ella T. Grasso Boulevard in New Haven, Robinson was in the passenger's seat. A short time later, at approximately 8:50 p.m., Robinson's automobile was parked along Shelton Avenue in New Haven .... At that time, the victims, Trayvon Washington and Taijhon Washington, were walking home from a friend's house. They walked past Robinson's automobile while someone was getting into it.... Approximately two minutes after they had passed the automobile ... [it] approached them at a high rate of speed.... Then, several gunshots emanated from the automobile. Taijhon Washington suffered fatal gunshot injuries to his chest. Trayvon Washington was shot in the head, resulting in a fractured skull
. Although he survived the shooting, he endured extensive medical treatment, and a bullet from that incident remained lodged in his head at the time of trial.
(Footnotes omitted.) State v. Covington , 184 Conn. App. 332, 335–37, 194 A.3d 1224 (2018) ; see also id., 336–37, 194 A.3d 1224 n.3 ( ).
The defendant was subsequently charged with, inter alia, carrying a pistol or revolver without a permit in violation of § 29-35 (a).2 At the defendant's trial, the state did not present direct, numerical evidence of the length of the barrel of the firearm that it alleged he had used to commit the shooting. The firearm was never recovered by the police, and none of the state's witnesses specifically described its barrel length.
The jury was, however, presented with the following relevant circumstantial evidence about the firearm. Earl Williams, a firearms examiner, testified about his examination of the two bullets retrieved from Taijhon Washington's body. He testified that both bullets were ".32 caliber class bullets" and, although mangled, exhibited discernable "rifling" impressions. Williams explained that rifling impressions are created by firearms that are manufactured with grooves along the inside of the barrel to make the bullets rotate when fired. Williams testified that rifling impressions are typical of "all rifled firearms" and that "handguns, such as pistols and revolvers" leave rifling impressions. Williams explained that shotguns, by contrast, "are a smooth bore" and do not have rifling. Williams further testified that the bullets found in Taijhon Washington's body were "consistent with bullets that would be fired out of a .32 caliber handgun or revolver."3
The state also called Crenshaw as a witness. Crenshaw testified that, while riding in Robinson's vehicle a few hours before the shooting occurred, she saw "a gun" inside the glove compartment. Although Crenshaw did not testify about the size of the glove compartment, the state submitted into evidence a photograph of the interior of Robinson's vehicle, which depicted the glove compartment open.
Crenshaw further testified that, when the defendant and Robinson arrived at her residence shortly after the shooting occurred, she saw Robinson carrying "a handgun." Specifically, Crenshaw testified that she saw Robinson "pull [the] gun out of his waistband" and hand it to the defendant, who then hid it inside of a dresser drawer. Crenshaw also testified that she had not seen that firearm before, and that she could not describe what it looked like.
The jury found the defendant guilty of carrying a pistol or revolver without a permit in violation of § 29-35 (a). The trial court imposed a sentence on this conviction of five years incarceration, execution suspended after three years, followed by three years of probation.4 State v. Covington , supra, 184 Conn. App. 334 n.1, 194 A.3d 1224.
The defendant appealed from this conviction to the Appellate Court, claiming that there was insufficient evidence that he carried a firearm with a barrel length of less than twelve inches.5 Id., 341, 194 A.3d 1224. In rejecting this claim, the Appellate Court concluded, first, that there was sufficient evidence from which the jury could have inferred that the defendant, rather than Robinson, was the shooter and, therefore, that he had carried a firearm of some type at the time and place of the shooting. Id., 343–44, 194 A.3d 1224.
Second, the Appellate Court determined that there was sufficient evidence to permit the jury to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that the barrel length of the firearm was less than twelve inches. Id., 350, 194 A.3d 1224. The Appellate Court relied on Williams' testimony that the rifling impressions on the bullets recovered from Taijhon Washington's body were "consistent" with having been fired from a "handgun or revolver," as well as Crenshaw's testimony that, shortly after the shooting occurred, she saw Robinson remove "a handgun" from his "waistband" and hand it to the defendant. (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 345–46, 194 A.3d 1224. The Appellate Court reasoned that the use of the terms "revolver" and "handgun" by these witnesses permitted the jury to infer that the length of the barrel of the firearm used in the shooting was less than twelve inches. Id., 347–49, 194 A.3d 1224. The Appellate Court further reasoned that Crenshaw's testimony that Robinson removed the handgun from his "waistband" permitted the jury to conclude "that the barrel of the gun must [have been] less than twelve inches in length." Id., 349, 194 A.3d 1224.
On appeal to this court,6 the defendant claims that the Appellate Court incorrectly concluded that there was sufficient evidence that the firearm had a barrel length of less than twelve inches.7 We disagree.
We begin with the general principles governing our review. "The standard of review we apply to a claim of insufficient evidence is well established. In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a criminal conviction we apply a [two part] test. First, we construe the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict. Second, we determine whether upon the facts so construed and the inferences reasonably drawn therefrom the [jury] reasonably could have concluded that the cumulative force of the evidence established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt....
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Stephenson
...view of the evidence that supports the [jury's] verdict of guilty." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Covington , 335 Conn. 212, 219, 229 A.3d 1036 (2020) ; see also State v. Adams , 327 Conn. 297, 304–305, 173 A.3d 943 (2017). We are mindful, however, that inferences cannot be b......
-
State v. Bruny
...a reasonable doubt that its barrel is less than twelve inches in length." (Citation omitted; emphasis omitted.) State v. Covington , 335 Conn. 212, 220, 229 A.3d 1036 (2020). In Covington , we held that the barrel length element had been proven by sufficient evidence when the state presente......
-
State v. Jones
...of business."7 (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Covington , 184 Conn. App. 332, 339, 194 A.3d 1224 (2018), aff'd, 335 Conn. 212, 229 A.3d 1036 (2020). This court has explained that carrying a pistol and possession of a pistol are different concepts. See id. Although "a person ca......
-
Morales v. Comm'r of Corr.
...to accept or reject." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Covington, 184 Conn.App. 332, 343, 194 A.3d 1224 (2018), aff'd, 335 Conn. 212, 229 A.3d 1036 (2020). Thus, the jury was free to credit those portions of the petitioner's testimony in which he stated that he feared for his li......