People ex rel. Bay City v. State Treasurer

Decision Date18 October 1871
Citation23 Mich. 499
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
PartiesThe People on the relation of Bay City v. The State Treasurer

Submitted without argument October 17, 1871.

Application for mandamus.

The opinion contains a full statement of the case.

Writ of mandamus issued, without costs.

J. W McMath, for the relator.

Dwight May, Attorney-General, and George V. N. Lothrop, for the respondent.

Cooley J. Campbell, Ch. J., and Christiancy, J., Graves, J concurred.

OPINION

Cooley, J.:

This is an application for a mandamus to require the respondent to deliver to the proper authorities of Bay City certain bonds which, under the provisions of an act entitled "An act to enable any township, city or village to pledge its aid, by loan or donation, to any railroad company now chartered or organized under, and by virtue of, the laws of the state of Michigan, in the construction of its road," approved March 22, 1869 (Sess. L. 1869, p. 89), had been issued and deposited in the respondent's office in aid of the Jackson, Lansing & Saginaw railroad company. The act in question undertook to empower any such township or city to pledge its aid to any railroad company chartered or organized, or that might thereafter be organized, under the laws of the state, in the construction of the road of such company, by way of loan or donation, for such sum or sums, not exceeding ten per centum of the assessed valuation then last made, of the real and personal property of such township or city, as a majority of the electors should, at a meeting called for the purpose, determine; but with certain provisos which we need not here recite. Any township or city availing itself of the provisions of the act by voting aid to any railroad company was to issue coupon bonds for the amount of aid granted, which was to be deposited in the office of the treasurer of the state, and by him delivered to such railroad company on a certificate from the governor, showing that the company under the act had become entitled thereto. And the bonds so issued were to be paid as they fell due, from taxes levied upon the taxable property of the municipality issuing the same. The provisions of the act were also extended to incorporated villages.

Under this act, it appears that Bay City voted aid to the Jackson, Lansing & Saginaw railroad company to the amount of one hundred thousand dollars, and issued and deposited its coupon bonds with the state treasurer therefor. We are not advised whether the aid to this extent was to be by way of donation or loan, nor do we regard it as material. The city now desires the return of the bonds, and has made demand therefor upon the treasurer, who has declined to comply therewith.

In The People v. The Township Board of Salem, 20 Mich. 452, this court decided that the municipal corporations of this state had no authority in return for, or upon the basis of, the incidental benefits anticipated, to exercise the power of taxation in aid of private corporations building, or proposing to build, railroads to be owned and controlled by their corporators; and that bonds issued by way of such aid, being incipient steps leading to taxation, were therefore unauthorized. We held, moreover, that the taxing power of the state had certain definite limits, one of which was that the tax must be for a public purpose; and that within the meaning of these words as employed to measure the authority of the state to demand and enforce the contributions of its citizens, a railroad in the hands of a private corporation was no more a public purpose than a manufactory, a newspaper establishment or any other means for the carrying on by individuals of a business which, while private in its nature, nevertheless supplied a public need. Our conclusion, therefore, was, that the legislature could neither compel the taxation of municipalities in aid of railroad companies, nor could it empower them, in order to give such aid, to tax themselves, or to contract indebtedness which must be paid by taxation.

The case mentioned was argued with signal ability, and no legal controversy ever passed upon by the judicial tribunals of the state received a more patient and deliberative hearing or examination. The conclusion reached by the majority of the court, was one which struck at the root of all the legislation of which the act in question was an instance. We found no warrant for it in the constitution. On the contrary, we found that it assumed to take from the citizen his property under a pretense of taxation, but in a case and for a purpose not admitting of an exercise of that power. Our constitution has carefully provided a shield against an invasion of the citizen's right to his property, in the provision which guarantees to every person due process of law: Art. VI., § 32. To take a man's property from him under pretense of taxation, for a purpose for which taxation is not admissible, is not due process of law, but is an unlawful confiscation.

The state treasurer, we have no doubt, is acting in good faith in awaiting the order of this court before delivering up the bonds as requested. We assume that he desires the advice of the court as to his duty in the premises, and that it is not his purpose or desire to cause unnecessary trouble litigation or expense to the municipal authorities. By way of giving such advice, and in order to render any future application of this character unnecessary, we repeat at this time the main point of our previous decision. We based our judgment upon a ground that we thought could not be misunderstood, and the scope of which could be perfectly comprehended. All our reasoning went to show that when the property of the individual was taken by the state, under the forms of taxation, for the use of a private corporation, and for...

To continue reading

Request your trial
83 cases
  • Dunn v. Love
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • June 5, 1934
    ... ... Proceedings ... by J. S. Love, State Superintendent of Banks, opposed by B ... L. Dunn and ers, for the reorganization of the ... People's Bank & Trust Company of Tupelo. From a decree ... 336, 99 N.E. 1, Am. Dec. 1915C, 200; Bay ... City v. State Treasurer, 23 Mich. 499; Cooley's ... Const ... 373] at the time it ... was made. In U.S. ex rel. Hoffman v. Quincy, 71 U.S ... 535, 4 Wall. 535, 18 ... ...
  • Ellingham v. Dye
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • July 5, 1912
    ...construe them as the people did in their adoption, if the means of arriving at that construction are within their power.” Bay City v. State Treasurer, 23 Mich. 499, 506. There can be little doubt but that the framers of the revised Constitution of 1851 believed that in article 16 they had p......
  • State ex rel. Linde v. Hall
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • September 11, 1916
    ...be consulted, and should have weight in arriving at that construction”-are the words of that eminent jurist Judge Cooley in Bay City v. State Treasurer, 23 Mich. 499, quoted and approved last year in a case closely parallel to this in facts in State ex rel. v. Clausen, 85 Wash. 260, 148 Pac......
  • Requests of Governor and Senate on Constitutionality of Act No. 294 of Public Acts of 1972, In re
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • June 18, 1973
    ...spoke quite plainly on the subject of trying to avoid a constitutional purpose by a technical construction. In People ex rel. Bay City v. State Treasurer, 23 Mich. 499, 506 (1871) he said: '. . . (I)t cannot be permissible to the courts that in order to aid evasions and circumventions, they......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT