232 F.3d 901 (10th Cir. 2000), 99-1331, Fields v. Romer
|Citation:||232 F.3d 901|
|Party Name:||Troy Lamonte FIELDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Roy ROMER, Governor; Aristedes W. Zavaras; Colorado Department of Corrections, Employees Known and Unknown; State of Colorado; Bowie County Correctional Facility, also known as Bowie County Detention Center, Bowie County Detention Facility, Bowie County Sheriff Department, and Bowie County Jail, Employee|
|Case Date:||October 30, 2000|
|Court:||United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit|
This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA10 Rule 36.3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)
2000 CJ C.A.R. 6054
Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, EBEL, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT [*]
Mr. Fields is a state prisoner under the custody of the Colorado Department of Corrections (CDOC). Following his transfer, along with other prisoners, to the Bowie County Correctional Facility (BCCF) in Bowie County, Texas, Mr. Fields filed this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging he was being subjected to cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. His action for damages was severed from a pending class action filed on behalf of all Colordo inmates who had been transferred to the BCCF due to overcrowding. As a result of the class action, the inmates, including Mr. Fields, were transferred back to Colorado. In the present damage action, the district court granted defendants' motions to dismiss.
Mr. Fields alleges that the conditions at the Bowie County Correctional Facility (BCCF) were generally inhumane. He also describes three macing incidents which occurred while he was housed there. Mr. Fields' complaint names as defendants, inter alia, the Governor of Colorado, Roy Romer; the Executive Director of the CDOC, Aristedes Zavaras; the CDOC itself; the Sheriff of Bowie County, Mary Choate; and the warden of the Bowie County Correctional Center, Tony Richardson. 1
The district court dismissed the complaint with prejudice against all defendants under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP