De Korwin v. First National Bank of Chicago
Decision Date | 22 June 1956 |
Docket Number | No. 11649.,11649. |
Citation | 235 F.2d 156 |
Parties | Margaret DE KORWIN, etc., Plaintiff, v. The FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, etc., et al., Defendants. The FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, Trustee, etc., Petitioner-Appellee, v. Samuel A. RINELLA, Respondent-Appellant. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit |
Samuel A. Rinella, Myer N. Rosengard, Chicago, Ill., for appellant.
Charles Rivers Aiken, William S. Bodman, Chicago, Ill., for appellee.
Before LINDLEY, SWAIM and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judges.
In an equity proceeding having to do with the trust estate mentioned in De Korwin v. First National Bank of Chicago, 7 Cir., 156 F.2d 858, certiorari denied 329 U.S. 795, 67 S.Ct. 481, 91 L.Ed. 680, affirming, D.C., 84 F.Supp. 918, in 7 Cir., 179 F.2d 347, certiorari denied, Pratt v. De Korwin, 339 U.S. 982, 70 S.Ct. 1025, 94 L.Ed. 1386, and in De Korwin v. First National Bank of Chicago, D.C., 94 F.Supp. 577, the district court, in De Korwin v. First National Bank of Chicago, D.C., 136 F.Supp. 720, restrained Marie Louise Tonella and her attorney, Samuel A. Rinella, from prosecuting, in the Superior Court of Cook County, a partition suit involving the trust property. From that decree, Mrs. Tonella, the litigant, has taken no appeal; her attorney, Rinella, has appealed, and prays that we reverse the order enjoining him from prosecuting the said suit.
In the trial court's decision, D.C., 136 F.Supp. 720, Judge Igoe has supplied a chronicle of the salient events and reached conclusions which we consider unassailable. Consequently, we shall supplement his decision only briefly and only to the extent necessary to dispose of two specific subject matters, the right of Rinella to prosecute his appeal, and the question of whether, in view of the fact that Mrs. Tonella did not appeal, the review now sought has become moot.
While the administration of the trust was pending in the district court, Rinella instituted the partition suit in Mrs. Tonella's behalf in the state court. We think it clear that the complaint was filed without her permission, and that shortly after it was filed she directed Rinella to dismiss it. He refused to do so. Thereupon she appeared in Superior Court with other counsel and obtained an order dismissing her complaint with prejudice. Some 40 days later Rinella on his own account procured an order in the Superior Court reinstating the cause. It was the prosecution of this suit that the district court restrained.
The trial court explored the situation and disposed of it thus, 136 F. Supp. at page 723 of its opinion: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Koehring Co. v. Hyde Const. Co.
...28 U.S.C. Sec. 2283 (State of State court proceedings); De Korwin v. First National Bank of Chicago, 136 F.Supp. 720, (N.D.Ill.1955), 235 F.2d 156 (1956); Alabama Vermiculite Corp. v. Patterson, 149 F.Supp. 543 (W.D. SC 1955). This power however, does not warrant a Federal Court in enjoinin......
-
De Korwin v. First National Bank of Chicago
...918; 7 Cir., 179 F.2d 347, certiorari denied 339 U.S. 982, 70 S.Ct. 1028, 94 L. Ed. 1386; D.C., 94 F.Supp. 577; D.C., 136 F.Supp. 720; 7 Cir., 235 F.2d 156; D.C., 155 F.Supp. 2 D.C., 84 F.Supp. 918, affirmed, 7 Cir., 179 F.2d 347, certiorari denied 339 U.S. 982, 70 S.Ct. 1028, 94 L.Ed. 1386......
-
Gannon v. American Airlines, 5452
...v. Wardman, 84 U.S.App.D.C. 343, 173 F.2d 648; Cramp Shipbuilding Co. v. United States, 3 Cir., 195 F.2d 848; De Korwin v. First National Bank of Chicago, 7 Cir., 235 F.2d 156. Gannon held an unsatisfied final judgment against Britton rendered in the state court in Illinois. In their joint ......
-
De Korwin v. First National Bank of Chicago
...National Bank of Chicago, 1946, 156 F.2d 858; DeKorwin v. First National Bank of Chicago, 1950, 179 F.2d 347; DeKorwin v. First National Bank of Chicago, 1956, 235 F.2d 156, and DeKorwin v. First National Bank of Chicago, 1959, 267 F.2d 2 On March 30, 1959, this Court held that the District......