Cox v. Long
Decision Date | 06 September 1977 |
Docket Number | No. 54171,No. 2,54171,2 |
Citation | 143 Ga.App. 182,237 S.E.2d 672 |
Parties | Perry COX et al. v. Jack LONG et al |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Dupree & Staples, Barry Staples, Hylton B. Dupree, Jr., Marietta, for appellants.
Heyman & Sizemore, Robert E. Tritt, Patrick L. Swindall, Atlanta, Cochran, Camp & Snipes, J. A. Cochran, Smyrna, Awtrey, Parker, Risse, Mangerie & Brantley, G. Grant Brantley, Marietta, for appellees.
This appeal follows an order dismissing plaintiffs' complaint for lack of jurisdiction over the defendant. The sole issue presented is whether the Long Arm Statute, Ga.Code Ann. § 24-113.1, confers jurisdiction under the facts here. We hold that it does and, accordingly, reverse the judgment.
The facts are not in dispute. Defendants were Georgia residents and owned certain real estate in Cobb County. They subsequently moved to California and have not returned to Georgia since. Some time after becoming California residents, defendants listed their house for sale with a Georgia realtor through a Georgia real estate salesman. Plaintiffs, Georgia residents, offered to purchase the realty. Defendants were advised of the offer and accepted. The offer, preliminary negotiations relating to the realty, preparation of documents, closing, recording of deeds and payment of fees took place in Georgia. Defendants executed the contract and the deeds relating to the realty in California and did not participate in the closing. Defendants received a check subsequent to the disbursements having been made at the closing. Plaintiffs' complaint, based on breach of contract and fraud, alleges that defendants falsely represented that monthly payments on the realty purchased included insurance and further falsely represented that an escrow account existed and that said account would be transferred to plaintiffs in lieu of tax and insurance prorations.
1. Code Ann. § 24-113.1 provides in pertinent part that "A court of this State may exercise personal jurisdiction over any nonresident . . . as to a cause of action arising from any of the acts, omissions, ownership, use or possession, . . . if in person or through an agent, he: (a) Transacts any business within this State; or (b) Commits a tortious act or omission within this State . . . (d) Owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within this State."
Appellant contends that the facts of this case as applied to Code Ann. § 24-113.1(a), (b) and (d) form the basis for personal jurisdiction over the nonresident defendants herein.
2. Coe & Payne Co. v. Wood-Mosaic Corp., 230 Ga. 58, 60, 195 S.E.2d 399, 401.
3. This case is controlled by Porter v. Mid-State Homes, Inc., 133 Ga.App. 706, 213 S.E.2d 10. Personal jurisdiction exists over defendant as the claim arose out of defendant's ownership of realty in Georgia. Code Ann. § 24-113.1(d). See McIntosh v. Mid-State Homes, Inc., 232 Ga. 871, 209 S.E.2d 203 ( ). Cf. Co-op Mortgage Investments v. Pendley, 134 Ga.App. 236, 242, 214 S.E.2d 572 ( ).
Since we find that Code Ann. § 24-113.1(d) confers jurisdiction, it is unnecessary to determine whether Code Ann. § 24-113.1(a) and (b) are also applicable to this situation. But see Porter v. Mid-State Homes, Inc., supra ( ); ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Moore v. Lindsey
...Georgia has a manifest interest in resolving controversies concerning real property situated in Georgia, Cox v. Long, 143 Ga.App. 182, 183, 237 S.E.2d 672, 674 (1977). The cases finding jurisdiction under the section of the statute that concerns the ownership of real property reflect a prot......
-
Gold Kist, Inc. v. Baskin-Robbins Ice Cream Co.
...courts. See, e. g., Brooks Shoe Manufacturing, Inc. v. Byrd, 144 Ga.App. 431, 432, 241 S.E.2d 299, 300-01 (1977); Cox v. Long, 143 Ga.App. 182, 237 S.E.2d 672, 673 (1977). See also Shingleton v. Armor Velvet Corp., 621 F.2d 180 at 182 (5th Cir. The defendant contends that it is only subsect......
-
Bankhead Enterprises, Inc. v. Norfolk and W. Ry. Co.
...260 S.E.2d 9, 11 (1979); Brooks Shoe Mfg., Inc. v. Byrd, 144 Ga.App. 431, 432, 241 S.E.2d 299, 300-01 (1977); Cox v. Long, 143 Ga.App. 182, 183, 237 S.E.2d 672, 673 (1977). See also Shingleton v. Armor Velvet Corp., 621 F.2d 180, 182 (5th Cir. 1980). Although the Georgia Long-Arm Statute is......
-
Lyons Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Gross, Civ. A. No. CV681-28.
...of defendant's Georgia realty." Hart v. DeLowe Partners, Ltd., 147 Ga.App. 715, 716, 250 S.E.2d 169 (1978) (citing Cox v. Long, 143 Ga.App. 182, 237 S.E.2d 672 (1977)). Apparently, plaintiffs seek to analogize, for jurisdictional purposes, the sale of real property to the transfer of corpor......