McLain v. Mercantile Trust Co.
Decision Date | 18 February 1922 |
Docket Number | No. 22389.,22389. |
Citation | 237 S.W. 506,292 Mo. 114 |
Parties | McLAIN v. MERCANTILE TRUST CO. et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court; George H. Shields, Judge.
Suit by Florence O. McLain against the Mercantile Trust Company and others. Petition dismissed, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
Suit in partition of a certain lot or parcel of land in the city of St. Louis. At the conclusion of the testimony the court nisi dismissed plaintiff's petition, and she appeals.
The petition was in the usual form, alleging:
That J. T. McLain, deceased, by his last will and testament duly admitted to probate on the 8th day of November, 1916, devised and bequeathed said property to the Mercantile Trust Company, as trustee, for the benefit of plaintiff, Margaret Merle Schierbaum, her daughter, and Girard D. Schierbaum, her grandson, to enjoy the income therefrom in the following proportions: One-half to plaintiff, one-fourth to her daughter, Margaret Merle Schierbaum, and one-fourth to her grandson, Girard D. Schierbaum; that on the 2d day of January, 1917, plaintiff filed her renouncement of said will as the widow of said J. T. McLain, deceased: "that at the time of said renouncement she intended to take a one-half interest in said estate, and ever after that did take a one-half interest in said estate; that in making her settlements with said court a one-half interest in the rents of said property and said estate were given and awarded to her, and after the administration of said estate a one-half interest in said rents and profits of said estate were paid to her by consent of all the parties, recognizing that she was the owner of a one-half interest in said estate by virtue of said renunciation so made as above."
It was further alleged:
That appellant paid one half of the debts of the estate and one half of the taxes due on said estate and that the Mercantile Trust Company paid the other half, and "that at the time of renouncing under said will the probate court of the city of St. Louis made an order that she take a one-half interest in said estate, and she has relied upon said renouncement and said conduct of the parties hereto as giving her an undivided one-half interest in said above property in fee-simple right."
Other immaterial allegations were contained in the petition, and there was the usual prayer for partition of said real estate.
Defendants answered, admitting the death of J. T. McLain and due proof of his will, and the devise of said property to respondent Mercantile Trust Company, as trustee, and that appellant renounced said will at the time alleged in her petition, and then specifically denied that by such renunciation, by election, or by any other means or medium, plaintiff became entitled to a one-half interest in the said premises.
The case was tried below upon an agreed statement of facts, which tended to support the allegations of appellant's petition in so far as the terms of the will were concerned, and it appeared that the Mercantile Trust Company, as trustee, had declined to take charge of the property devised, but it further appeared that it was otherwise performing its duty under the trusteeship created by the will.
Clauses 5 and 6 of the will are pertinent here, and are as follows:
Appellant's renunciation of the will was as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
E. C. Robinson Lumber Co. v. Lowrey
......C. ROBINSON LUMBER COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff. v. Gene LOWREY, Margaret Lowrey, Mercantile Mortgage Company, a. corporation, and Roger A. Bailey, Trustee, Defendants. No. 7245. Springfield ... subjected to a materialman's lien adjudged to be prior and superior to the lien of a deed of trust recorded . Page 639. on April 6, 1949, which secured payment of a note held by defendant, ...v. St. Clair Auto. Finance Co., Mo.App., 253 S.W.2d 543, 545. 7 McLain v. Mercantile Trust Co., 292 Mo. 114, 237 S.W. 506, 508(2); Goodwin & McDowell Motor Co. v. St. ......
-
State ex Inf. Shartel v. Mo. Utilities Co.
......931, 146 Mo. 70, 82, 83; Bank v. Ragsdale, 171 Mo. 168, 185, 71 S.W. 178; Commerce Trust Co. v. Keck, 223 S.W. 1057, 283 Mo. 209, 223; Pollard v. Ward, 233 S.W. 14, 289 Mo. 275, 286; ...[McLain v. Mercantile Trust Company, 237 S.W. 506, 292 Mo. 114; Berry v. Mass. Bonding & Ins. Co., 221 S.W. ......
-
Crismond v. Kendrick
...... 29 S.W.2d 1100 . HORACE CRISMOND and IVY M. SPRATT . v. . BIRDIE KENDRICK ET AL.; COMMERCE TRUST COMPANY, B.C. HOWARD and PHOENIX MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellants. . No. 28420. . ...Ward, 289 Mo. 275, 233 S.W. 14; Grafeman Dairy Co. v. Bank, 290 Mo. 311, 235 S.W. 435; McLain v. Trust Co., 292 Mo. 114, 237 S.W. 506; Vette v. Hackman, 292 Mo. 138, 237 S.W. 802. (4) To be ......
-
Bennett v. National Fire Ins. Co.
......Marcus v. Rhode Island Ins. Co., 187 Mo. App. 134, 173 S.W. 30; Trust Co. of St. Louis v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 298 Mo. 472, 210 S.W. 98; National Fire Ins. Co. v. Munger, I ...v. Munger, supra; State ex rel. v. Mo. Utilities Co., 331 Mo. 337, 53 S.W. (2d) 394; McLain v. Mercantile Trust Co., 292 Mo. 114, 237 S.W. 506; State ex rel. Moss v. Hamilton, 303 Mo. 302, ......