People v. Mosby
| Citation | 659 N.Y.S.2d 610,239 A.D.2d 938 |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Marcus MOSBY, Appellant. |
| Decision Date | 30 May 1997 |
| Court | New York Supreme Court Appellate Division |
Edward J. Nowak by Stephen Bird, Rochester, for Appellant.
Howard R. Relin by Elizabeth Clifford, Rochester, for Respondent.
Before DENMAN, P.J., and PINE, DOERR, BALIO and BOEHM, JJ.
Defendant was convicted of the murders of Willie Banks and Jason Witrsan in front of an apartment building. At trial, defendant raised the defense of self-defense. On direct examination, he testified that he felt he was in danger because someone had been killed in the same apartment from which he sold drugs, and there was a bullet hole in the door of the apartment. On cross-examination, the prosecutor attempted to impeach defendant by asking him whether he had so informed the police in his statement to them. Defendant contends that the prosecutor improperly questioned him concerning postarrest silence. We disagree. "When a defendant voluntarily speaks to the police, neither due process nor the privilege against self-incrimination prohibits cross-examination of the defendant about his failure to inform the police at that time of exculpatory circumstances to which he later testifies at trial" (People v. Spinelli, 214 A.D.2d 135, 140, 631 N.Y.S.2d 863, lv. dismissed 87 N.Y.2d 1025, 644 N.Y.S.2d 159, 666 N.E.2d 1073; see, People v. Savage, 50 N.Y.2d 673, 680, 431 N.Y.S.2d 382, 409 N.E.2d 858, cert. denied 449 U.S. 1016, 101 S.Ct. 577, 66 L.Ed.2d 475). In any event, the proof of defendant's guilt was overwhelming, and there is no reasonable possibility that the error might have contributed to defendant's conviction. Thus, any error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230, 237, 367 N.Y.S.2d 213, 326 N.E.2d 787).
Judgment unanimously affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Mosby v. Senkowski
......The Appellate Division rejected this argument, and the New York Court of Appeals denied Mosby leave to appeal. People v. Mosby, 239 A.D.2d 938, 659 N.Y.S.2d 610, 610-11 (1997); 90 N.Y.2d 942, 664 N.Y.S.2d 760, 687 N.E.2d 657 (1997). . Mosby then filed an application for a writ of coram nobis seeking to vacate his conviction on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel for ......
-
People v. Boop
...789;People v. Murphy, 79 A.D.3d 1451, 1453, 913 N.Y.S.2d 815,lv. denied16 N.Y.3d 862, 923 N.Y.S.2d 424, 947 N.E.2d 1203;People v. Mosby, 239 A.D.2d 938, 938–939, 659 N.Y.S.2d 610,lv. denied90 N.Y.2d 942, 664 N.Y.S.2d 760, 687 N.E.2d 657). Defendant further contends that County Court erred i......
- People v. Mosby