City of Valparaiso v. The Chicago And Grand Trunk Railway Company

Decision Date29 April 1890
Docket Number14,190
Citation24 N.E. 249,123 Ind. 467
PartiesThe City of Valparaiso v. The Chicago and Grand Trunk Railway Company
CourtIndiana Supreme Court

From the Lake Circuit Court.

Judgment affirmed.

T. J Merrifield, for appellant.

W Johnston, for appellee.

OPINION

Coffey, J.

This was a proceeding by the city of Valparaiso against the appellee to condemn the land in controversy, for the purposes of a public street. From the order of condemnation the appellee appealed to the circuit court, and defended upon the ground that said land was a part of its right of way, and ground needed and used for depot purposes.

A trial of the cause in the circuit court resulted in a verdict and judgment for the appellee, from which this appeal is prosecuted.

The first question presented by the record relates to the power of a city to condemn real estate belonging to a railroad company, in actual use for right of way and for depot purposes, and to appropriate the same to the use of the public as a street.

The statute authorizing cities to condemn and take lands for public use as a street, is general in its terms. There is no express provision authorizing the taking of property already dedicated to a public use, nor is there anything in the statute from which such a power is necessarily implied.

The land held by a railroad corporation for a right of way and for the purposes of depots, when in actual use as such, is dedicated to the public use.

In re City of Buffalo, etc., 68 N.Y. 167, is in point here. In that case the city of Buffalo undertook to condemn and take certain land belonging to railroad corporations for the purpose of extending the Main and Hamburgh street canal in said city. Folger, J., who delivered the opinion of the court, said: "The city of Buffalo must produce statutory authority, which in express terms gives it power to acquire these lands; or statutory authority from which the implication that it may, is necessary. The city produces the charter given to it by the Legislature, by which, there is granted to it, 'power to take lands for * * canals, basins, slips and other public waters, and for any other corporate purpose or object,' and to 'enlarge and alter' the same; and by which 'unwholesome waters and matter may be abated by draining, or in any other way it shall deem expedient.' The charter does not give power in express terms to take these lands, or any other held for public use. * * * To defeat the attainment of an important public purpose to which lands have already been subjected, the legislative intent must unequivocally appear." See, also, In re Boston and Albany, etc., R. R. Co., 53 N.Y. 574.

In the case of Prospect Park, etc., R. R. Co. v Williamson, 91 N.Y. 552, the town of Gravesend undertook to open a public highway across the lands of the railroad company acquired for depot purposes, consisting of several acres lying at the terminus of the road on the seashore at Coney Island. After referring to the statute of the State prohibiting the laying out of public highways through improved...

To continue reading

Request your trial
24 cases
  • Northwestern Telephone Exchange Company v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • May 22, 1899
    ...L. Ry. Co., 61 Minn. 502; St. Onge v. Day, 11 Colo. 368; Presbrey v. Old Colony, 103 Mass. 1; Baltimore v. North, 103 Ind. 486; City v. Chicago, 123 Ind. 486; City Chicago, 123 Ind. 467; City v. Jeffersonville, 126 Ind. 466. The testimony reveals no paramount necessity for taking the proper......
  • Town of Cicero v. Lake Erie & W.R. Co.
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • January 30, 1912
    ...by a railroad corporation for a right of way, when in actual use as such, is dedicated to a public use. City of Valparaiso v. Chicago & G. T. R. R. Co., 123 Ind. 467, 24 N. E. 249. [12] The general doctrine is recognized in this state that, where land is once appropriated to an important pu......
  • State ex rel. Roland v. Dreyer
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 21, 1910
    ...appropriated to public use could not be again appropriated to another public use, as had been ruled in that State in city of Valparaiso v. Ry. Co., 123 Ind. 467. But the court said: "The rule urged by appellant only applies when the second public use would naturally injure or destroy the us......
  • Cemetery Co. v. Warren School Tp. of Marion County
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • January 7, 1957
    ...Shore & Michigan, etc., Ry. Co., 1892, 132 Ind. 558, 32 N.E. 215, 18 L.R.A. 367, 32 Am.St.Rep. 277; City of Valparaiso v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co., 1890, 123 Ind. 467, 24 N.E. 249; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Louisville, etc., R. Co., 1916, 185 Ind. 690, 114 N.E. 406; Evergreen Cemet......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT