Brown v. Haertel

Decision Date11 October 1932
Citation210 Wis. 354,244 N.W. 633
PartiesBROWN v. HAERTEL ET AL.
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Marathon County; A. H. Reid, Circuit Judge. Reversed.

Action commenced on the 4th day of December, 1931, by John Brown against Henry Haertel and Henry Haertel Service, Inc., a corporation, to recover damages to an automobile. From a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants on the 31st day of December, 1931, the defendants appeal.Fisher, Cashin & Reinholdt, of Stevens Point, for appellants.

Stone & Park, of Wausau (Goggins, Brazeau & Graves, of Wisconsin Rapids, of counsel), for respondent.

OWEN, J.

This is a companion case to that of Marion Brown against the same defendants, 244 N. W. 630, decided herewith. John Brown was the owner of the car which was being driven by his wife, Marion Brown. He brings this action to recover damages sustained by his automobile as a result of the collision. While the record does not disclose tangible evidence from which it can be determined whether the car was driven by Marion Brown upon his business so that, while driving the car, she was acting as his agent, upon the doctrine of Enea v. Pfister, 180 Wis. 329, 192 N. W. 1018, it must be so held. Her negligence is therefore imputed to him, and this case must take the same course as that of Marion Brown.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Bielski v. Schulze
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • 6 Marzo 1962
    ...he is entitled. Likewise, we point out that sec. 331.045, Stats., has no application to the doctrine of contribution. Brown v. Haertel (1933), 210 Wis. 354, 244 N.W. 633, 246 N.W. 691; Zurn v. Whatley (1933), 213 Wis. 365, 251 N.W. 435. The right of one tortfeasor to contribution is not bar......
  • D.L. by Friederichs v. Huebner
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • 3 Febrero 1983
    ...whether the child can be contributorily negligent in a case involving violation of the child labor laws. Brown v. Haertel (on rehearing), 210 Wis. 354, 359, 244 N.W. 633, 246 N.W. 691 (1933). The adoption of comparative negligence did not create liability for plaintiff's negligence where no......
  • W. Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Milwaukee Gen. Const. Co.
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • 5 Diciembre 1933
    ...who has paid more than his just share of such a loss. The right is founded upon principles of equity and natural justice. Brown v. Haertel, 210 Wis. 354, 244 N. W. 633, 246 N. W. 691. It is a liability which the law has imposed upon the joint tort-feasors because of the circumstances in whi......
  • Brown v. Haertel
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • 7 Febrero 1933
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT