246 F.3d 675 (9th Cir. 2000), 99-36097, McDaniels v. Wallenstein

• Citation: 246 F.3d 675
• Party Name: Joseph A. MCDANIELS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Arthur WALLENSTEIN, Director, King County Correctional Facility; Michael Graber, Associate Director, King County Correctional Facility; Craig Nelson, Major, King County Correctional Facility; Bob Deneui, Program Administrator, King County Correctional Facility; Ray Coleman, Associate Director, King Count
• Case Date: December 15, 2000
• Court: United States Courts of Appeals, U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Page 675

246 F.3d 675 (9th Cir. 2000)

Joseph A. MCDANIELS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Arthur WALLENSTEIN, Director, King County Correctional Facility; Michael Graber, Associate Director, King County Correctional Facility; Craig Nelson, Major, King County Correctional Facility; Bob Deneui, Program Administrator, King County Correctional Facility; Ray Coleman, Associate Director, King County Correctional Facility Regional Justice Center; Reed Holtgeerts, Major, King County Correctional Facility Regional Justice Center; Chris Womac, Program Administrator, King County Correctional Facility Regional Justice Center; E. Bautista, Sergeant; T. Fiechtner; Tisha Kemp-Brown, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 99-36097.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

December 15, 2000

Submitted December 6, 2000. ²

D.C. No. CV-98-00553-WLD

Editorial Note:

This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, William L. Dwyer, District Judge, Presiding.

Before TROTT, GRABER, and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM ¹

Joseph A. McDaniels appeals pro se the district court's denial of his "motion for post-judgment relief" in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Our jurisdiction is limited to the district court's October 13, 1999 order denying McDaniel's motion for post-judgment relief. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1), (4); Wages v. I.R.S., 915 F.2d 1230, 1234 (9th Cir.1990). We review for abuse of discretion, see Molloy v. Wilson, 878 F.2d 313, 315 (9th Cir.1989), and affirm.

AFFIRMED.

---

Notes:

[2] The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

[1] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

---