25 F.3d 1038 (4th Cir. 1994), 94-1203, Cheatham v. Williams

Docket Nº:94-1203.
Citation:25 F.3d 1038
Party Name:Adam Troy CHEATHAM, Plaintiff Appellant, v. John M. WILLIAMS, former Assistant Superintendent/Programs Hoke Correctional Institution individually and in his former official capacity; G. Wayne Spears, former Superintendent for Hoke Correctional Institution individually and in his former official capacity; Aaron Johnson, former Secretary of the Depar
Case Date:June 13, 1994
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 1038

25 F.3d 1038 (4th Cir. 1994)

Adam Troy CHEATHAM, Plaintiff Appellant,

v.

John M. WILLIAMS, former Assistant Superintendent/Programs Hoke Correctional Institution individually and in his former official capacity; G. Wayne Spears, former Superintendent for Hoke Correctional Institution individually and in his former official capacity; Aaron Johnson, former Secretary of the Department of Correction individually and in his former official capacity; Franklin E. Freeman, Jr., Secretary of Department of Corrections in his official capacity, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-1203.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

June 13, 1994

Editorial Note:

This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA4 Rule 36 regarding use of unpublished opinions)

Submitted: May 24, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Franklin T. Dupree, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-93-235-CIV-5-D)

Adam Troy Cheatham, Appellant Pro Se.

Valerie L. Bateman, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

E.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing two of Appellant's three claims and retaining the third for further litigation. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This Court may exercise jurisdiction only...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP