250 F.Supp. 215 (D.Vt. 1966), Civ. A. 4147, Brattleboro Pub. Co. v. Winmill Pub. Corp.

• Citation: 250 F.Supp. 215
• Docket Number: Civ. A. 4147
• Date: 02 February 1966
• Parties: Brattleboro Pub. Co. v. Winmill Pub. Corp.
• Court: U.S. District Court — District of Vermont

Page 215

250 F.Supp. 215 (D.Vt. 1966)

BRATTLEBORO PUBLISHING COMPANY

v.

WINMILL PUBLISHING CORPORATION.

Civ. A. No. 4147.

United States District Court, D. Vermont

Feb. 2, 1966

Page 216

Gannett, Oakes & Weber, Brattleboro, Vt., for plaintiff.

John S. Burgess, Brattleboro, Vt., for defendant.

GIBSON, District Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

The plaintiff instituted this action against the defendant under Title 17 U.S.C.A. § 101 for alleged violation of certain copyrights claimed by it and also for alleged unfair competition and unfair trade practices. The plaintiff complained that the defendant copied certain advertisements that were published in plaintiff's copyrighted newspaper, and that such copying was an infringement of the plaintiff's copyrights and also was unfair competition and a use of unfair practices. The plaintiff, in its complaint, asked that the defendant be permanently enjoined from infringing any copyrights of any issues of plaintiff's newspaper and the defendant be required to pay to plaintiff such damages as it suffered due to defendant's infringement and to account to the plaintiff for all profits realized from the infringement.

Page 217

FINDINGS OF FACT

The plaintiff publishes a daily newspaper called the Brattleboro Daily Reformer which is circulated in and about Brattleboro, Vermont. Defendant publishes a weekly pamphlet or direct-mail circular called the Brattleboro Town Crier consisting almost exclusively of advertising which also is circulated in and about the area of Brattleboro, Vermont.

The advertisements alleged to have been copied by the defendant and allegedly constituting the infringement may be described and hereafter referred to as (1) The County Kitchen Advertisement, (2) The Brattleboro Country Club Pro Shop, Rocky York, Club Pro Advertisement, (3) the H. H. Thompson Credit Jewelers Advertisement, and (4) the Conn and John Realtors Advertisement.

At all times material to this case the plaintiff had secured valid copyrights in reference to its newspaper. Throughout the period of the alleged infringements, the plaintiff's newspaper contained on the first page, immediately below the title, the requisite information prescribed by the copy right law, 17 U.S.C.A. § 19.

The plaintiff alleges infringement of its copyrights by the defendant in connection with the four advertisements listed above. In the plaintiff's original complaint, it also alleged other infringements of its copyrights. However, no evidence was introduced except as to the abovelisted advertisements, so as to any other alleged infringements, the complaint is dismissed.

For the purpose of understanding the case with which we are faced, I think it may be well to take the different ads which are in controversy and describe them.

The first advertisement with which we are concerned is known as the 'Country Kitchen Ad'. It was first published in the plaintiff's newspaper on October 16, 1964. The ad was reproduced in the defendant's Town Crier on October 29, 1964. The ad as it appeared in the defendant's periodical was slightly larger than the ad in the plaintiff's newspaper, but this was because of the photo offset printing process used by the defendant. The ad in the defendant's paper also had a somewhat darker border and it did not contain the copyright insignia as did the ad in the plaintiff's newspaper. Except for the above differences, the style of type, the illustration used in the ad, and the language of both the ads were identical. On November 12, 1964 the defendant ran the 'Country Kitchen Ad' using the same illustration that appeared in the plaintiff's ad. However, on this date, the defendant's ad used different type style and wording. There is nothing unusual about this ad that would cause it to be distinctive in any particular manner, except for the illustration which both plaintiff and defendant concede was owned by the advertiser. The defendant ran the 'Country Kitchen Ad' in its paper, the Crier, on the instruction given to the defendant by the advertiser, and such instructions were as to the form and context of the ad.

The next ad may be designated as the 'Brattleboro Country Club Pro Shop, Rocky York Club Pro' advertisement. It first appeared on page 6 of the Brattleboro Daily Reformer of November 4, 1964. The advertisement was reproduced in the defendant's Town Crier on November 19, 1964. This ad was identical in every manner with the advertisement originally produced in the plaintiff's paper. The defendant was instructed by the...