251 F.Supp.2d 948 (D.D.C. 2003), 02-582, McConnell v. Federal Election Commission

Docket Nº:02-582 CKK,KLH,RJL, 02-581 CKK,KLH,RJL, 02-633 CKK,KLH,RJL, 02-751 CKK,KLH,RJL, 02-753 CKK,KLH,RJL, 02-754 CKK,KLH,RJL, 02-781 CKK,KLH,RJL, 02-874 CKK,KLH,RJL, 02-875 CKK,KLH,RJL.
Citation:251 F.Supp.2d 948
Party Name:Senator Mitch McCONNELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. National Rifle Association of America, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Federal Election Commission, et al., Defendants. Emily Echols, a minor child, by and through her next friends, Tim and Windy Echols, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Federal Election Commission, et al.
Case Date:May 01, 2003
Court:United States District Courts, District of Columbia
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 948

251 F.Supp.2d 948 (D.D.C. 2003)

Senator Mitch McCONNELL, et al., Plaintiffs,

v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al., Defendants.

National Rifle Association of America, et al., Plaintiffs,

v.

Federal Election Commission, et al., Defendants.

Emily Echols, a minor child, by and through her next friends, Tim and Windy Echols, et al., Plaintiffs,

v.

Federal Election Commission, et al., Defendants.

Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al., Plaintiffs,

v.

Federal Election Commission, et al., Defendants.

National Association of Broadcasters, Plaintiff,

v.

Federal Election Commission, et al., Defendants.

American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, et al., Plaintiffs,

v.

Federal Election Commission, et al., Defendants.

Congressman Ron Paul, et al., Plaintiffs,

v.

Federal Election Commission, et al., Defendants.

Republican National Committee, et al., Plaintiffs,

Page 949

v.

Federal Election Commission, et al. Defendants.

California Democratic Party, et al., Plaintiffs,

v.

Federal Election Commission, et al., Defendants.

Victoria Jackson Gray Adams, et al., Plaintiffs,

v.

Federal Election Commission, et al., Defendants.

Representative Bennie G. Thompson, et al., Plaintiffs,

v.

Federal Election Commission, et al., Defendants.

Nos. 02-582 CKK,KLH,RJL, 02-581 CKK,KLH,RJL, 02-633 CKK,KLH,RJL, 02-751 CKK,KLH,RJL, 02-753 CKK,KLH,RJL, 02-754 CKK,KLH,RJL, 02-781 CKK,KLH,RJL, 02-874 CKK,KLH,RJL, 02-875 CKK,KLH,RJL.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

May 1, 2003

FINAL JUDGMENT

Pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the four opinions of the three-judge District Court hearing these eleven consolidated actions, it is this 1st day of May, 2003, hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Judgment [# 206] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; it is further

ORDERED that Defendants' and Intervenors' Motion for Judgment [# 204] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; it is further

ORDERED that in regard to Section 101 of BCRA, judgment for Plaintiffs is entered in part with regard to new FECA Sections 323(a) and 323(b) and judgment for Defendants is entered in part with regard to new FECA Sections 323(a) and 323(b), in accordance with Judge Leon's Memorandum Opinion. Section 323(a) is...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP