United States v. Paradise

Citation253 F.2d 319
Decision Date26 March 1958
Docket NumberNo. 236,Docket 24510.,236
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. William PARADISE, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)

William J. Cantwell, New York City, for appellant.

Paul W. Williams, U. S. Atty. for Southern District of New York, New York City (Fioravante G. Perrotta, Lynbrook, N. Y., and Mark F. Hughes, Jr., Asst. U. S. Attys., New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before MEDINA, WATERMAN and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted on all four counts of an indictment charging: in Counts 1 and 2, wilful "receiving, possessing, concealing and facilitating the transportation and concealment" of 108 grains of heroin, in violation of 21 U.S. C.A. §§ 173, 174, and possession of the same quantity of heroin and not paying the special tax and registering as required by law, in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 4724(c) and 7237(a); also in Counts 3 and 4, violation of the same laws with respect to a separate quantity of 417 grains of heroin. All these offenses were alleged to have been committed on October 23, 1956. Upon proof of appellant's prior conviction of having had dealings in narcotics he was sentenced to ten years imprisonment on Counts 1 and 3, and five years imprisonment on Counts 2 and 4, all the sentences to run concurrently.

The facts are simple and may be briefly stated. Having information, apparently obtained from narcotics addicts and perhaps others, that appellant was peddling heroin, agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics kept appellant under surveillance. On the afternoon of October 23, 1956, one of the agents working with another agent in the vicinity, having been told that appellant would soon arrive with narcotics on his person, waited near the corner of Riverside Drive and 87th Street, in New York City, and soon thereafter a cab drew up at the curb and appellant emerged. He was immediately placed under arrest and four packages containing 108 grains of heroin were found in his pocket. As he had previously been seen to go and come from an apartment house at 2727 Palisade Avenue in Riverdale, where the agents suspected more narcotics would be found, the agents proceeded to drive there with appellant. The conversation between appellant and the agents in the automobile was to this effect: he conceded that he had not paid the tax on the heroin found in his pocket and that he had not registered with the Commissioner of Narcotics; but he insisted that his name was Bill Jackson and gave his address as 32 Monroe Street. As the car approached 2727 Palisade Avenue, however, appellant said, "Well, we are here now. You know where I live. My name is Billy Paradise. The stuff is up there."

The agents and appellant went up to the apartment indicated by appellant, he let them in the apartment with his own key, and he promptly led the agents into the bedroom where he opened the door of the closet and said, "I have some in my jacket pocket," and he also indicated that more would be found in the top drawer of the dresser. In these two places 417 additional grains of heroin were found.

The arrest took place on October 23, 1956, a lawyer appeared for appellant on November 5, 1956, he was indicted on November 9, 1956, a superseding indictment, on which he was tried, was filed on December 7, 1956, to which he pleaded not guilty on December 10, 1956. The trial was had on December 20 and 21. No motion to suppress the evidence obtained on October 23, 1956 was made at any time.

Although he was represented at the trial by coun...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • United States v. Strouth
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Tennessee
    • 23 Abril 1970
    ...496, 21 L.Ed.2d 469, citing Gorman v. United States, C.A. 1st (1967), 380 F.2d 158, 163-164, and referring also to United States v. Paradise, C.A. 2d (1958), 253 F.2d 319; Schaffer v. State (Del.Sup., 1962), 184 A.2d 689, certiorari denied (1963), 374 U.S. 834, 83 S.Ct. 1882, 10 L.Ed.2d 105......
  • Peterson v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue (In re Estate of Peterson) , Docket No. 2405-78.
    • United States
    • United States Tax Court
    • 7 Julio 1980
    ......COMMISSIONER of INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT Docket No. 2405-78. United States Tax Court Filed July 7, 1980. .         Decedent contracted to deliver to buyer ......
  • United States v. Jordan
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • 30 Julio 1968
    ...to render the consent involuntary. See Gorman v. United States, 380 F.2d 158, 163-64 (1st Cir.1967). See also United States v. Paradise, 253 F.2d 319 (2d Cir.1958); Annot., 9 A.L.R.3d 858 The trial court recognized that the government had a heavy burden of proving voluntary consent, see Uni......
  • Mandel v. Sturr
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • 29 Abril 1959
    ......Nos. 59 & 60, Dockets 24993, 24994. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. Argued January 7, 1959. Decided April 29, 1959.266 F.2d ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT