Van Buskirk v. Baldwin, PETITIONER-APPELLANT

Decision Date09 May 2001
Docket NumberPETITIONER-APPELLANT,No. 00-35640,RESPONDENT-APPELLEE,00-35640
Citation255 F.3d 974
Parties(9th Cir. 2001) MARK STEVEN VAN BUSKIRK,, v. GEORGE H. BALDWIN,
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

NOTE: THIS OPINION HAS BEEN AMENDED. SEE AMENDED OPINION AT 265 F.3d 1080.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Jr. v. Cullen
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Central District of California
    • July 23, 2010
  • Walker v. Martel
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • March 7, 2013
  • Buskirk v. Baldwin
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • September 24, 2001
    ...Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges. ORDER The opinion filed June 28, 2001 in the above matter, No. 00-35640, and appearing at 255 F.3d 974, 977 (9th Cir. 2001), is amended as 1) Slip op. at 8205, lines 11-15; 255 F.3d at 977, lines 41- 48 delete: The first half of the question is whether ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT