261 P.3d 1184 (Okla.Jud.Eth. 2011), 2011-2, In re Judicial Ethics Opinion 2011-2
|Citation:||261 P.3d 1184, 2011 OK JUD ETH 2|
|Party Name:||JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 2011-2.|
|Case Date:||May 20, 2011|
|Court:||Oklahoma Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel|
The Opinions of the Ethics Advisory Panel are advisory only and can be relied by the Council on Judicial Complaints while recommending discipline of a Judge or a Judicial Candidate and not binding on the Council or Courts in the exercise of their judicial discipline responsibilities.
JUDICIAL ETHICS ADVISORY PANEL
¶ 1 Question: May a Judge serve as an Attorney in Fact, due to an appointment in a Durable Power of Attorney, for a relative?
¶ 2 Facts: 1. Judge's spouse's relative appointed Judge's spouse as Attorney in Fact and Judge as Alternate in Durable Power of Attorney.
¶ 3 2. Relative is now medically incapacitated. (Judge's spouse is only living relative of Principal.)
¶ 4 3. Judge is assisting spouse in dealing with medical issues and Nursing Home.
¶ 5 Discussion: 1. Canon 3-Rule 3.8(A) of Oklahoma Code of Judicial Conduct: " Appointment to Fiduciary Position" provides:
" A judge shall not accept appointment to serve in a fiduciary position, such as executor, administrator, trustee, guardian, attorney in fact, or other personal representative, except for the estate, trust, or person of a member of the judge's family, or a member of the judge's household and then only if such service will not interfere with the proper performance of judicial duties."
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP