Hanover Fire Ins Co v. Carr Harding

Decision Date23 November 1926
Docket NumberNo. 179,179
Citation49 A. L. R. 713,47 S.Ct. 179,272 U.S. 494,71 L.Ed. 372
PartiesHANOVER FIRE INS. CO. v. CARR (HARDING, Substitute), County Treasurer
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

[Syllabus from pages 494-496 intentionally omitted] Messrs. Charles E. Hughes, of New York City, Charles S. Deneen and Frederick D. Silber, both of Chicago, Ill., and Rufus S. Day, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff in error.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 496-498 intentionally omitted] Messrs. Benson Landon and Leon Hornstein, both of Chicago, Ill., for defendant in error.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 499-501 intentionally omitted] Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a writ of error under section 237 of the Judicial Code (Comp. St. § 1214) to the judgment of the Supreme Court of Illinois, affirming a decree of the superior court of Cook county dismissing the bill of the Hanover Fire Insurance Company, a corporation of New York, against Patrick J. Carr, county treasurer and ex officio tax collector of Cook county, Ill. The prayer was for an injunction to prevent the distraint of the property of the complainant under a warrant for the collection of $10,678.50 as taxes due under a law of Illinois, which law, the bill averred, denied to the complainant the equal protection of the laws under the Fourteenth Amendment of the federal Constitution.

The defendant filed an answer denying the claims of the bill and after a reply the case was heard by the trial court which made findings of fact in its decree based on a stipulation by the parties and entered a decree as set forth below.

The law in question reads as follows:

'Foreign Companies.-Tax on Net Receipts. Section 30. Every agent of any insurance company, incorporated by the authority of any other state or government, shall return to the proper officer of the county, town or munici- pality in which the agency is established, in the month of May, annually, the amount of the net receipts of such agency for the preceding year, which shall be entered on the tax lists of the county, town and municipality, and subject to the same rate of taxation, for all purposes-state, county, town and municipal-that other personal property is subject to at the place where located; said tax to be in lieu of all town and municipal licenses; and all laws and parts of laws inconsistent herewith are hereby repealed: Provided, that the provisions of this section shall not be construed to prohibit cities having an organized fire department from levying a tax, or license fee, not exceeding two per cent. in accordance with the provisions of their respective charters, on the gross receipts of such agency, to be applied exclusively to the support of the fire department of such city.' Cahill's Rev. Stat. Ill. 1925, p. 1405, c. 73, § 159.

This had been in force since 1869 and was part of the act of March 11 of that year, entitled 'An act to incorporate and to govern fire, marine and inland navigation insurance companies doing business in the state of Illinois.' The section was amended to the above form by an act approved May 31, 1879.

By section 22 and other sections of the original act of 1869 (Cahill's Rev. Stat. Ill. 1925, p. 1402, c. 73, § 150), it was made unlawful for a foreign insurance company to transact any insurance business in the state unless it had a prescribed amount of capital, appointed an attorney in the state on whom process of law could be served, filed a properly certified copy of the charter or deed of settlement of the insurance company, showing its name and the place where located, the amount of its capital and a detailed statement of its assets, together with its indebtedness, the losses adjusted and unpaid, the amount incurred and in process of adjustment, and a copy of its last annual report. It was required also to deposit with the director of trade and commerce of the state, for the benefit and security of the policy holders residing in the United States, a sum of not less than $200,000 in 6 per centum stock of the United States or the state of Illinois, or approved mortgage securities, with a provision that, so long as the company should continue solvent and comply with the laws of the state, it might collect the interest on these securities. The law provided that it should not be lawful for the agents of the company to transact business without procuring annually from the director of trade and commerce the authority stating that such company had complied with all the requisitions of the act which applied to it, and that any violation of the provisions of the act should subject the one violating it to a penalty not exceeding $500 for each violation; that such insurance companies should make annual statements of their condition and affairs to the director of trade and commerce in the same manner and in the same form as similar insurance companies organized under the laws of the state, on or before the first day of March in each year for the year ending on the preceding 30th of September. The insurance superintendent was given authority by the same act to investigate affairs of the foreign companies, such investigation to be at the expense of the company, and if he found the condition of any one unsound, to close up the business of the company by application to the circuit court of the county in which it had its principal office. By the same act, each foreign company was required to pay $30 for filing the charter, $10 for filing the annual statement required, and $2 for each certificate of authority for agents, and certain other fees of a similar character. Paragraphs 150, 152, 156, Cahill's Rev. Stat. Ill. 1925, c. 73.

By the Act of June 28, 1919 (Cahill's Rev. Stat. Ill. 1925, p. 1390, c. 73, § 79), it was provided that each nonresident corporation licensed and admitted to do an insur- ance business in the state should pay an annual state tax for the privilege of so doing, equal to 2 per centum of the gross amount of premiums received during the preceding calendar year on contracts covering risks within the state after certain reductions; that the tax should be in lieu of all license fees or privilege or occupation taxes levied or assessed by any municipality in the state, and that no municipality should impose any license fee, privilege or occupation tax upon such corporation for the privilege of doing an insurance business therein; but this should not be construed to prohibit the levy and collection of any state, county or municipal taxes upon the real and personal property of such corporations, or the levying and collection of taxes authorized by section 30 above quoted.

By section 12 of the same act (Cahill's Rev. Stat. Ill. p. 1391, c. 73, § 90), it was provided that if any corporation should fail or neglect to make any report, or to refuse to pay any tax assessment within 30 days after the same became due, the department of trade and commerce should have power to revoke its license to transact the business of insurance in the state, or to suspend it until the reports were filed or the taxes paid.

The complainant insurance company complied with the requirements of section 22 and other unrepealed sections of the act of 1869 and paid the 2 per cent. tax on its premiums received as provided by the act of 1919.

By the General Revenue Act of Illinois, in force since February 25, 1898 (Cahill's Rev. Stat. 1925, p. 2042, c. 120, § 329), personal property is to be valued at its fair cash value, which value is to be set down in one column to be headed 'Full Value,' and one-half part thereof is to be ascertained and set down in another column headed 'Assessed Value.' The one-half value of all the property so ascertained and set down is to be the value for all purposes of taxation. It is further stipulated in this case and found by the trial court that for the year 1923, and for many years prior thereto, there has been what is called an equalization which systematically and intentionally reduces the amount set down in the column headed 'Full Value' to not more than 60 per cent. of the actual market value of the personal property returned and by further reducing this by 50 per cent. to make the assessed value in accord with the statute, the tax is collected only on 30 per cent. of the full value.

This suit presents the question of the validity of the assessment made by taxing officers under section 30 for the year 1922. The Supreme Court of Illinois, in People v. Barrett, 309 Ill. 53, 139 N. E. 903, in an opinion announced June 20, 1923, near the close of the year for which the assessment of 1922 was made, held that the tax under section 30 was an occupation tax and that no reduction should be permitted to foreign insurance companies in the assessment for taxation of their annual net receipts. The superior court found that the actual amount of net cash receipts of the complainant company was $90,824, less by $45,000 than the amount reported by the board of review, so that its decree forbade the collection of more than $7,184.18, instead of $10,678.50, for which the warrant had issued, but denied further relief. The complainant insisted that under the previous practice and proper construction of section 30 as a property tax, with due equalization and debasement, the tax assessed should have been $2,155.24, and that this, if anything, is all that should be collected from it. The Supreme Court by a divided court, three judges dissenting, affirmed the decree of the superior court. Hanover Fire Insurance Co. v. Carr, 317 Ill. 366, 148 N. E. 23.

The petitioner is an insurance corporation organized under the laws of the state of New York. By its charter it is authorized to do a business of insurance against the hazard of fire, marine perils, inland navigation, tornado, theft, explosion, property damage to automobiles and other property by collision, crop insurance, and other similar lines of insurance against specified hazards. There are in Illinois domestic...

To continue reading

Request your trial
155 cases
  • In re Pers. Prop. Tax of Girard Trust Co. for the Year 1937
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
    • December 29, 1938
    ...as an admission fee, or condition precedent to its admission to do business within the State (Hanover Fire Insurance Co. v. Harding, 272 U.S. 494, at page 510, 47 S.Ct. 179, 71 L.Ed. 372, 49 A.L.R. 713, and see Nugent Funeral Home v. Beamish, 315 Pa. 345, at page 348, 173 A. 177), once with......
  • Miller v. Lamar Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • November 24, 1930
    ...... LAMAR LIFE INS. CO. SAME v. MISSISSIPPI FIRE INS. CO. SAME v. BANKERS' & MERCHANTS' FIRE INS. CO Nos. ... Railway Company v. Greens, 216 U.S. 400, 54 L.Ed. 536; Hanover Fire Insurance Co. v. Carr, 272 U.S. 494, 71 L.Ed. 372; Campbell ......
  • State ex rel. Jordan, Dist. Atty. v. Gilmer Grocery Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • January 13, 1930
    ...... Company, 97 Miss. 879, 901; City of Jackson v. Mississippi Fire Insurance Company, 132 Miss. 415;. Huggins v. Fire Ins. Co., 107 Miss. ...Corp. v. Day, Treas., State of. Ohio et al., 69 L.Ed. 10; Hanover Fire Ins. Co. v. Carr, 272 U.S. 494, 71 L.Ed. 372; Power Mfg. Co. v. ......
  • Louis Liggett Co v. Lee 12 8212 13, 1933
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • March 13, 1933
    ...compare Southern R. Co. v. Greene, 216 U.S. 400, 30 S.Ct. 287, 54 L.Ed. 536, 17 Ann.Cas. 1247; Hanover Fire Insurance Co. v. Harding, 272 U.S. 494, 47 S.Ct. 179, 71 L.Ed. 372, 49 A.L.R. 713; nor could it be, since the statute affects both classes of corporations alike. The suit is brought a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • How Many Times Was Lochner-era Substantive Due Process Effective? - Michael J. Phillips
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 48-3, March 1997
    • Invalid date
    ...284 U.S. 239, 245-47 (1931) (tax on stock of national banks exceeds tax on stock of state banks); Hanover Fire Ins. Co. v. Harding, 272 U.S. 494, 516-17 (1926) (foreign insurance companies taxed differently than similarly situated domestic insurers); Air-Way Elec. Appliance Corp. v. Day, 26......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • The Path of Constitutional Law Suplemmentary Materials
    • January 1, 2007
    ...80 S.Ct. 1502, 4 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1960), 1079 Hannibal v. Husen, 95 U.S. 465, 24 L.Ed. 527 (1878), 719, 865-66 Hanover Ins. Co. v. Harding, 272 U.S. 494, 47 S.Ct. 179, 71 L.Ed. 372 (1926), Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1, 10 S.Ct. 504, 33 L.Ed. 842 (1890), 138, 220, 601-02, 605-07, 609, 613 -14 ......
  • The Equal Protection Clause
    • United States
    • The Path of Constitutional Law Part IV: The Final Cause Of Constitutional Law Sub-Part Three: Civil War Amendments And Due Process Generally
    • January 1, 2007
    ...U.S. 389, 400-02 (1928). [427] Id. at 402. See, e.g., Power Co. v. Saunders, 274 U.S. 490, 493-97 (1927); Hanover Ins. Co. v. Harding, 272 U. S. 494, 507-17 (1926); Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Tafoya, 270 U. S. 426, 434-35 (1926); Western Union Tel. Co. v. Foster, 247 U. S. 105, 112-14 [4......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT