Payton v. Woodford, PETITIONER-APPELLEE
| Decision Date | 19 December 2001 |
| Docket Number | PETITIONER-APPELLANT,RESPONDENT-APPELLEE,PETITIONER-APPELLEE,N,RESPONDENT-APPELLANT,No. 00-99000,00-99000 |
| Citation | 273 F.3d 1271 |
| Parties | (9th Cir. 2001) WILLIAM CHARLES PAYTON,, v. JEANNE WOODFORD, ACTING WARDEN OF CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON AT SAN QUENTIN, WILLIAM CHARLES PAYTON,, v. JEANNE WOODFORD, ACTING WARDEN OF CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON AT SAN QUENTIN,o. 00-99003 |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Payton v. Woodford
... 299 F.3d 815 ... William Charles PAYTON, Petitioner-Appellee, ... Jeanne WOODFORD, Warden, Respondent-Appellant ... William Charles Payton, Petitioner-Appellant, ... Jeanne Woodford, Warden, Respondent-Appellee ... No. 00-99000 ... No. 00-99003 ... United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit ... Argued and Submitted En Banc March 20, 2002 ... ...
-
Payton v. Cullen
...in Vietnam, and that his sentence should be reversed for cumulative error. Id. at 925. The case was reheard en banc. Payton v. Woodford, 273 F.3d 1271 (9th Cir.2001) (granting rehearing en banc and ordering panel opinion not to be cited as precedent). The en banc panel reinstated the distri......