United States v. Manzi, 204
Decision Date | 09 April 1928 |
Docket Number | No. 204,204 |
Parties | UNITED STATES v. MANZI |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
The Attorney General and Mr. W. D. Mitchell, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., for the United States.
Aniello Manzi filed his declaration of intention to become a citizen of the United States October 15, 1913. He did December 19, 1914. On October 4, 1924, his widow Amalia, respondent herein, relying upon her husband's declaration, asked for citizenship. This was granted February 3, 1925, and certificate issued over the objection that her request came too late, more than seven years having passed since the husband made his declaration.
January 9, 1926, the United States began this proceeding by a petition in the District Court for Rhode Island to cancel her certificate upon the ground that it had been illegally procured. That court dismissed the petition and the Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the decree. (16 F.(2d) 884.) The single question for our consideration is one of law: Whether it was unnecessary for respondent to declare her intention because her husband had declared his in 1913.
The Solicitor General maintains, and we think rightly, that while a widow may have the benefit of her husband's declaration, she must perfect her citizenship under the restrictions specified for him, including the requirement that request for naturalization must come not more than seven years after such declaration. The intention of Congress was to treat the action of the husband as though taken by the widow herself.
The Act of June 29, 1906, 'to establish a Bureau of Immigration and Naturalization, and to provide for a uniform rule for the naturalization of aliens throughout the United States' (34 Stat. 596), definitely prescribes the circumstances under which aliens may be naturalized. Its requirements are much more stringent than those found in former acts.
Section 4, par. 1 (8 USCA § 373), directs that 2 years, at least, prior to his admission, and after he has reached the age of 18 years, the alien shall declare on oath that it is his bona fide intention to become a citizen, and then directs—
'Sec. 27. That substantially the following forms shall be used in the proceedings to which they relate ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Johnson v. Eisentrager
...his release.4 It is neither sentimentality nor chauvinism to repeat that 'Citizenship is a high privilege.' United States v. Manzi, 276 U.S. 463, 467, 48 S.Ct. 328, 329, 72 L.Ed. 654. The alien, to whom the United States has been traditionally hospitable, has been accorded a generous and as......
-
Schneiderman v. United States
...clearest sort of justification and proof. So, whatever may be the rule in a naturalization proceeding (see United States v. Manzi, 276 U.S. 463, 467, 48 S.Ct. 328, 329, 72 L.Ed. 654), in an action instituted under § 15 for the purpose of depriving one of the precious right of citizenship pr......
-
United States v. Kusche
...been given and ninety days had been allowed to elapse before the hearing there would be a different case." In the Manzi case, 1928, 276 U.S. 463, 48 S.Ct. 328, 72 L.Ed. 654, a certificate was held to have been illegally procured where the widow of the declarant attempted under Section 6 to ......
-
PETITION FOR NATURALIZATION OF FERRO
...at page 649, 49 S.Ct. at page 449, supra, "Doubts * * should be resolved * * * against the claimant." United States v. Manzi, 1928, 276 U.S. 463, 467, 48 S.Ct. 328, 329, 72 L.Ed. 654. Congress has declared that before one is entitled to the privilege of citizenship he must by competent evid......
-
Bring it on: the Supreme Court opens the floodgates with Rasul v. Bush.
...332 U.S. 789. Id. at 768, n. 1. (14) Eisentrager, 339 U.S. at 769. (15) Id. (16) Id. at 770. (17) Id. (quoting United States v. Manzi, 276 U.S. 463,467 (18) Eisentrager, 339 U.S. at 771. (19) Id. at 776. The Court outlined the limited situations in which resident aliens have been granted ac......