People v. Policano
| Decision Date | 13 November 2000 |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>DAVID POLICANO, Appellant. |
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
To continue reading
Request your trial
9 cases
-
Policano v. Herbert
...by New York courts when they affirmed Policano's depraved indifference conviction on direct appeal, see People v. Policano, 277 A.D.2d 331, 715 N.Y.S.2d 880 (2d Dep't 2000),2 and denied further review, see People v. Policano, 96 N.Y.2d 786, 725 N.Y.S.2d 651, 749 N.E.2d 220 (2001) (Smith, G.......
-
Policano v. Herbert
...Court found "that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt" (People v. Policano, 277 A.D.2d 331, 331-332, 715 N.Y.S.2d 880 [2d Dept 2000] [citation omitted]). Exercising its broad factual review power, the Appellate Division further pronounced i......
- People v. Ransom
-
Policano v. Herbert
...count. Policano's conviction was affirmed by the Appellate Division, Second Department, in a brief order. People v. Policano, 277 A.D.2d 331, 715 N.Y.S.2d 880 (2d Dep't 2000). His application for permission to appeal the Appellate Division's decision to the New York Court of Appeals was den......
Request a trial to view additional results