O'Connor & Harder Range & Furnace Co. v. Alexe
Decision Date | 06 December 1887 |
Parties | O'CONNOR & HARDER RANGE AND FURNACE COMPANY, Respondent, v. FRANK ALEXE; JOS. SCHNAIDER BREWING COMPANY, Interpleader, Appellant. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
APPEAL from the St. Louis Circuit Court, DANIEL DILLON, Judge.
Reversed and remanded.
BROADHEAD & HAEUSSLER, for the appellant: A mortgagee is a purchaser for value. Brocking v. Straeb, 17 Mo.App 303. The burden of proof was on the plaintiff to show that the interpleader had knowledge of the fact that the purchase price had not been paid. Albert v. Besel, 88 Mo 150; Bolckow Mill Co. v. Frazer, 22 Mo.App 109.
EUGENE C. SLEVIN, for the respondent: The cause having been submitted to the jury under proper instructions, the appellate court will not weigh the evidence to see whether the jury came to a correct conclusion on the facts. Johnson v. Building Co., 23 Mo.App. 546; Norton v. City of Moberly, 18 Mo.App. 457; St. Louis Type Foundry v. McCann, 68 Mo. 195. Fraud is not to be presumed; but anything which satisfies the mind and conscience of its existence is sufficient. Cooley on Torts, 475; Frederick v. Allgaier, 88 Mo. 598.
The plaintiff sold and delivered to the defendant, Alexe, six stoves, for cash, payable on delivery. Alexe paid twenty-five dollars on his purchase, leaving a balance unpaid. The record does not inform us of the date of this sale, or the amount of the balance remaining due to the seller. Afterwards, on November 12, 1885, Alexe executed and delivered to the interpleader, Jos. Schnaider Brewing Company, a chattel mortgage, conveying the stoves and other personal property, to secure the payment of a promissory note for seven hundred and fifty dollars, due one day after date. On December 3, 1885, the plaintiff sued Alexe by attachment before a justice of the peace, and caused the stoves to be seized by the constable. The Brewing Company interpleaded, claiming the stoves under its chattel mortgage. The same party took an appeal to the circuit court, where the verdict and judgment were for the present plaintiff, and against the interpleader. The controversy turns upon the application of section 2353, Revised Statutes, which provides as follows:
" Personal property shall, in all cases, be subject to execution on a judgment against the purchaser for the purchase price thereof, and shall in no case be exempt from such judgment and execution, except in the hands of an innocent purchaser for value, without notice of the existence of such prior claim for the purchase money."
At the trial the interpleader introduced in evidence the chattel mortgage, the record of the attachment proceedings, and the oral testimony of two witnesses, as follows:
Frank Sullivan testified:
E. J O'Connor testified: That he was a member of the O'Connor & Harder Range and Furnace Company; that Alexe had bought the stoves in question from them, for the prices mentioned in the account; that they were to be paid for on delivery; that he had only paid twenty-five dollars on account of them, and the balance was due; that Mr. Link was in possession of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Van Natta v. People's Street Railway
... ... 371; O'Connor, etc., Co. v. Frank Alexe, 28 ... Mo.App. 184; Fairgrieve v. Moberly, 29 Mo.App ... ...
-
Straus v. Rothan
...79 Mo. 191; State to use v. Mason, 96 Mo. 127; Mill Co. v. Turner, 23 Mo.App. 103; State to use v. Orahood, 27 Mo.App. 496; O'Connor v. Alexe, 28 Mo.App. 184; Boyd v. Co., 38 Mo.App. 210. OPINION Brace, J. -- This cause is certified here by the St. Louis court of appeals, on its judgment re......