Southern California Edison Company v. Railroad Commission of State of California, 377
| Decision Date | 21 October 1929 |
| Docket Number | No. 377,377 |
| Citation | 74 L.Ed. 636,280 U.S. 588,50 S.Ct. 37 |
| Parties | SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, petitioner, v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Messrs. Roy V. Reppy and W. C. Mullendore, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.
Mr. Arthur T. George, of Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of California denied.
* The Supreme Court of California filed the following memoranda:
S. F. 13461-Southern California Edison Co. v. Railroad Commission. By the Court on petition for rehearing: The questions presented by the petition for the writ (review) as to the validity of the proceedings under the Constitution of the United States, and all such constitutional objections, were considered by this court and decided adversely to the contention of the petitioner. The petition for a rehearing is therefore denied. Dated June 10, 1929.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
American Can Co. v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, Docket No. 69174.
...the province of the Board to decide. Ohio Clover Leaf Dairy Co., 8 B.T.A. 1249; 9 B.T.A. 433; affd. 34 Fed.(2d) 1022; certiorari denied, 280 U.S. 588. (First National Bank of Boston, Administrator, 25 B.T.A. 252, 257 (1932).) For the stipulation to mean what it is now interpreted to say wou......
-
Milburn v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R. Co., 30285.
......Paul & Pacific Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. . ...Paul & Pacific Railroad Company (hereinafter referred to as the railroad) ... his injuries under the common law of the state of Iowa, as changed by the Iowa Workmen's ...R. Co. v. Industrial Commission, 284 U. S. 296, 52 S. Ct. 151, 152, 76 L. Ed. ...458, 160 N. W. 552; Saunders v. Southern R. Co., 167 N. C. 375, 83 S. E. 573; see, also, ......
-
Thomas v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue (In re Estate of Thomas) , Docket Nos. 17715-81
...cert. denied 295 U.S. 731 (1935); Simmons Co. v. Commissioner, 33 F.2d 75 (1st Cir. 1929), affg. 8 B.T.A. 631 (1927), cert. denied 280 U.S. 588 (1929). Accordingly, such expenses have always been held to be nonamortizable. The rationale for this rule was explained by the United States Court......
-
Keller v. United States, Civ. No. 81-549-D.
...... alleges that plaintiff's complaint fails to state a claim against the United States because the ... L.Ed.2d 799 (1976); United States Lines Company v. Jarka Corporation of New England, 265 F.Supp. ... towed by the Navy to New Jersey from California......