Lucas v. Earl
Decision Date | 17 March 1930 |
Docket Number | No. 99,99 |
Parties | LUCAS, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, v. EARL |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
The Attorney General and Mr. Charles E. Hughes, Jr., Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Warren Olney, Jr., of San Francisco, Cal., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 111-113 intentionally omitted] Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.
This case presents the question whether the respondent, Earl, could be taxed for the whole of the salary and attorney's fees earned by him in the years 1920 and 1921, or should be taxed for only a half of them in view of a contract with his wife which we shall mention. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue and the Board of Tax Appeals imposed a tax upon the whole, but their decision was reversed by the Circuit Court of Appeals, 30 F.(2d) 898. A writ of certiorari was granted by this court.
By the contract, made in 1901, Earl and his wife agreed 'that any property either of us now has or may hereafter acquire * * * in any way, either by earnings (including salaries, fees, etc.), or any rights by contract or otherwise, during the existence of our marriage, or which we or either of us may receive by gift, bequest, devise, or inheritance, and all the proceeds, issues, and profits of any and all such property shall be treated and considered, and hereby is declared to be received, held, taken, and owned by us as joint tenants, and not otherwise, with the right of survivorship.' The validity of the contract is not questioned, and we assume it to be unquestionable under the law of the State of California, in which the parties lived. Nevertheless we are of opinion that the Commissioner and Board of Tax Appeals were right.
The Revenue Act of 1918 approved February 24, 1919, c. 18, §§ 210, 211, 212(a), 213(a), 40 Stat. 1057, 1062, 1064, 1065, imposes a tax upon the net income of every individual including 'income derived from salaries, wages, or compensation for personal service * * * of whatever kind and in whatever form paid,' § 213(a). The provisions of the Revenue Act of 1921, c. 136, 42 Stat. 227, 233, 237, 238, in sections bearing the same numbers are similar to those of the above. A very forcible argument is presented to the effect that the statute seeks to tax only income beneficially received, and that taking the question more technically the salary and fees became the joint property of Earl and his wife on the very first instant on...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Am. Advisory Servs., LLC v. Egon Zehnder Int'l, Inc.
...Id. § 162. The general rule of taxation is that income should be taxed to the party that earned it. See Lucas v. Earl , 281 U.S. 111, 114, 50 S.Ct. 241, 74 L.Ed. 731 (1930) ; Comm'r Internal Revenue v. Culbertson , 337 U.S. 733, 739–40, 69 S.Ct. 1210, 93 L.Ed. 1659 (1949) (explaining "the f......
-
Hanson v. Birmingham, Civ. No. 604.
...none but an economic significance, and so the application of § 22(a) is properly a matter of economic analysis. Cf. Lucas v. Earl, 281 U.S. 111, 50 S.Ct. 241, 74 L.Ed. 731. But §§ 181 and 182 import a concept of a different sort. These sections make taxability turn on the existence of the r......
-
United States v. Silk Harrison v. Greyvan Lines
...we think their statement of the law cannot be challenged successfully. Contracts, however 'skillfully devised,' Lucas v. Earl, 281 U.S. 111, 115, 50 S.Ct. 241, 74 L.Ed. 731, should not be permitted to shift tax liability as definitely fixed by the Probably it is quite impossible to extract ......
-
31 318 Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. First Security Bank of Utah 8212 305
...579, 61 S.Ct. 759, 85 L.Ed. 1055 (1941); Helvering v. Horst, 311 U.S. 112, 61 S.Ct. 144, 85 L.Ed. 75 (1940), and Lucas v. Earl, 281 U.S. 111, 50 S.Ct. 241, 74 L.Ed. 731 (1930). Having implicitly rejected the argument that mere nonreceipt of money is sufficient to avoid taxation, the Court p......
-
Tax Court In Brief | Estate Of Hoenshied v. Commissioner | Anticipatory Assignment Of Income, Charitable Contribution Deduction, And Qualified Appraisals
...112, 119 (1940), and that tax cannot be avoided "by anticipatory arrangements and contracts however skillfully devised," Lucas v. Earl, 281 U.S. 111, 115 (1930). A person with a fixed right to receive income from property thus cannot avoid taxation by arranging for another to gratuitously t......
-
The Supreme Court Rules: Contingent Attorney Fees are Taxable
...Alexander v. IRS, 72 F.3d 938 (1st Cir. 1995). [iii] Raymond v. Commissioner, 355 F.3d 107 (2nd Cir. 2004). [iv] O'Brien v. Commissioner, 319 F.2d 532 (3rd Cir. 1963). [v] Young v. Commissioner, 240 F.3d 369 (4th Cir. 2001). [vi] Kenseth v. Commissioner......
-
Domestic Trusts
...or the holder of the only share of voting stock in a corporation. The “fruit and tree” analogy is not applicable. [See Lucas v. Earl , 281 U.S. 111, 8 A.F.T.R. 10287 (1930); and Meisner v. United States , 133 F.3d 654 (8th Cir. 1998).] Referring of business is neither a gift nor a diversion......
-
Resolution Without Trial
...(1949). A taxpayer cannot exclude an economic gain from gross income by assigning the gain in advance to another party. Lucas v. Earl , 281 U.S. 111, 50 S.Ct. 241 (1930); Commissioner v. Sunnen , 333 U.S. 591, 604, 68 S.Ct. 715 (1948); Helvering v. Horst , 311 U.S. 112, 116-117, 61 S.Ct. 14......
-
Assignment of Income Doctrine
...income before it becomes due. 2 Harrison v. Schaffner , 312 U.S. 579, 580, 61 S.Ct. 759, 760-61, 85 L.Ed. 1055 (1941). 3 Lucas v. Earl , 281 U.S. 111, 115, 50 S.Ct. 241, 74 L.Ed. 731 (1930). 4 Meisner v. U.S. , 133 F.3d 654 (8th Cir. 1998). (In their divorce the wife received 40% of all ear......
-
Taxation of contingent fees.
...dissenting), aff'd, 259 F.3d 881 (7th Cir. 2001). (35) Id. at 427. (36) See, e.g., Helvering v. Horst, 311 U.S. 112 (1940); Lucas v. Earl, 281 U.S. 111 (37) See, e.g., Kenseth v. Commissioner, 259 F.3d 881 (7th Cir. 2001). (38) Id. at 883. (39) For a game effort at distinguishing contingent......