Carr v. Zaja
| Decision Date | 23 March 1931 |
| Docket Number | No. 125,125 |
| Citation | 283 U.S. 52,51 S.Ct. 360,75 L.Ed. 836 |
| Parties | CARR, Director of Immigration, v. ZAJA |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
The Attorney General and Mr. Claude R. Branch, of Providence, R. I., for petitioner.
Mr. Erwin I. Feldman, of Baltimore, Md., for respondent.
This case raises the same question as No. 92, Philippides v. Day, 283 U. S. 48, 51 S. Ct. 358, 75 L. Ed. 833, but, as stated in No. 92, was decided the other way by the circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Zaja is a Dalmatian, citizen of Jugo-Slavia. He shipped as a seaman upon an Italian ship and on its arrival at San Pedro, California, deserted the ship on January 25, 1925. He was arrested on October 4, 1928, more than three years after his entry, and after a hearing was ordered to be deported on the same ground as in No. 92. He obtained a writ of habeas corpus and was ordered to be discharged from custody. 37 F.(2d) 1016. The judgment must be reversed for the reasons given in No. 92. It is objected that the mandate of the Circuit Court of Appeals was not stayed, but was issued to the District Court and spread upon its records and that therefore the case is finished. But that does not defeat the jurisdiction of this Court. The Conqueror, 166 U. S. 110, 113, 17 S. Ct. 510, 41 L. Ed. 937; Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Behlmore, 169 U. S. 644, 648, 18 S. Ct. 502, 42 L. Ed. 889; Rule 45 (28 USCA § 354).
Judgment reversed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States v. Villamonte-Marquez
...reversal. See Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Flowers, 330 U.S. 464, 467, 67 S.Ct. 798, 799, 91 L.Ed. 1024 (1947); Carr v. Zaja, 283 U.S. 52, 51 S.Ct. 360, 75 L.Ed. 836 (1931). Under our reasoning in Mancusi v. Stubbs, 408 U.S. 204, 205-207, 92 S.Ct. 2308, 2309-2310, 33 L.Ed.2d 293 (1972), t......
-
Graddick v. Newman
...omitted). See Michigan v. Doran, 439 U.S. 282, 285, n.2, 99 S.Ct. 530, 533, n.2, 58 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978); Carr v. Zaja, 283 U.S. 52, 53, 51 S.Ct. 360, 360, 75 L.Ed. 836 (1931).* The only action sought by applicant from this Court is a decision "mak[ing] lawful a resumption of the custody." Ea......
-
Eagles v. United States Samuels
...following section 354. The fact that he has been so enlarged does not render the appeal of the custodian moot. Carr v. Zaja, 283 U.S. 52, 53, 51 S.Ct. 360, 75 L.Ed. 836. 3 In such a case the release is obtained through the assertion of judicial power. It is the propriety of the exercise of ......
-
United States v. Eisner
...that the issuance of the mandate did not bar a petition for certiorari by the defendant to the Supreme Court. Carr v. Zaja, 283 U.S. 52, 53, 51 S.Ct. 360, 75 L.Ed. 836; The Conqueror, 166 U.S. 110, 113, 17 S.Ct. 510, 41 L.Ed. 937. The time for withholding the issuance of the mandate expired......