State v. Daues
Decision Date | 21 May 1926 |
Docket Number | No. 26457.,26457. |
Citation | 284 S.W. 463 |
Parties | STATE ex rel. GOESSLING v. DAUES et al., Judges. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Mark D. Eagleton, John F. Clancy, E. J. Hullverson, and Harry S. Rooks, all of St. Louis, for relator.
Bryan, Williams & Cave, of St. Louis, for respondents.
On the application of relator we issued our writ of certiorari to review the opinion and judgment of the St. Louis Court of Appeals reversing and remanding a judgment of the circuit court of the city of St. Louis in favor of the relator against Excelsior Press Brick Company for damages for personal injuries sustained by relator in consequence of a collision between a Ford car driven by her husband, in which she was riding, and a truck driven by defendant's employee, on a slippery hard-surfaced street in the city of St. Louis.
The following excerpts from the opinion of the learned Court of Appeals (270 S. W. 390), will suffice for a statement of the facts and rulings complained of (italics ours):
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kimberling v. Wabash Ry. Co.
......436; Kern v. Payne, 65 Mont. 325, 211 Pac. 767, certiorari denied, 261 U.S. 617; Johnson v. Terminal Railroad Assn., 8 S.W. (2d) 891; Ill. State Trust Co. v. Railroad Co., 319 Mo. 608, 5 S.W. (2d) 368, certiorari denied, 278 U.S. 623; Rittenhouse v. Ry. Co., 299 Mo. 199, 252 S.W. 945; Martin ...(2d) 926; Kuhlman v. Water, Light & Transit Co., 307 Mo. 636, 271 S.W. 788; Stanton v. Jones, 59 S.W. (2d) 648; State ex rel. Goessling v. Daues, 314 Mo. 287, 284 S.W. 463; Goodwin v. Eugas, 290 Mo. 684, 236 S.W. 50; State ex rel. v. Ellison, 223 S.W. 673; Meily v. Railroad Co., 215 Mo. 597, ......
-
Propst v. Capital Mut. Assn.
......James, Jr. and L.F. Kinder for appellant. . (1) (a) Respondent's petition is fatally defective because it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; it fails to state the essential averments to entitle respondent to recover; that notice of accident ......
-
Telanus v. Simpson
......Moon v. Transit Co., 247 Mo. 227; Dyer v. Building Contr. Co., 258 S.W. 48; Courter v. Mercantile Co., 266 S.W. 340; State ex rel. Bush v. Sturgis, 281 Mo. 598; Mullery v. Tel. Co., 180 Mo. App. 128; Rohr v. Gas Lighting Co., 67 So. 361; Cowan v. Brick Co., 222 S.W. 926; ...v. Ellison 270 Mo. l.c. . 12 S.W.2d 930 . 653; State ex rel. v. Daues, 284 S.W. 463, 464.] These instructions are conflicting, and clearly the giving of Instruction 4 was prejudicial to defendants. . ......
-
Sloan v. Polar Wave Ice & Fuel Co.
......State ex rel. v. Daues, 284 S.W. 463; Nahorski v. Elec. Term. Ry. Co., 274 S.W. 1025; Phillips v. Am. Car & Fdy. Co., 274 S.W. 963. (e) Furthermore, the ......