284 U.S. 52 (1931), 3, Permutit Co. v. Graver Corporation

Docket Nº:No. 3
Citation:284 U.S. 52, 52 S.Ct. 53, 76 L.Ed. 163
Party Name:Permutit Co. v. Graver Corporation
Case Date:November 23, 1931
Court:United States Supreme Court

Page 52

284 U.S. 52 (1931)

52 S.Ct. 53, 76 L.Ed. 163

Permutit Co.


Graver Corporation

No. 3

United States Supreme Court

Nov. 23, 1931

Argued October 15, 16, 1931




1. A patent which fails to describe in the specification, and to point out particularly and distinctly claim, an invention or discovery, is void. R.S. § 4888. P. 57.

2. While drawings may be referred to for illustration and may be used as an aid in interpreting the specification or claim, they are of no avail where there is an entire absence of description of the alleged invention or a failure to claim it. P. 60.

3. Patent No. 1,195,923 (Claims 1 and 5) to Gans, for an apparatus for softening water, is void, for want of disclosure and want of invention. Pp. 57-60.

This apparatus employs the process of softening water by means of zeolites, which take up calcium and magnesium from hard water, giving up their sodium base, and are "regenerated" when washed by a solution of common salt. The light zeolite particles rest upon a filter-bed of sand and gravel within the container in which the water is treated. When the water, or the regenerating salt solution, is flowed through them from below, they are likely to be

Page 53

washed away. To prevent this, in the earlier filter, a metal screen was placed close above the bed of zeolite. The patentee was alleged to have discovered that this "locking" of the zeolites interfered with their efficient action, and that it was necessary to have an open space above them in which they might rise, or "boil," and spread out and reform in the bed, and the alleged invention chiefly relied upon in the litigation lay in removal of the close-fitting cover and in placing the screen some distance above the layer; but this was not mentioned in the specification or in either of the claims. A further contention, under Claim 5, that there was invention in placing the means for removing the salt solution at the lowest point of the casing is also rejected. "It does not require the exercise of the inventive faculty to place at the bottom of a receptacle the outlet through which it is to be drained."

43 F.2d 898 affirmed.

Certiorari, 283 U.S. 812, to review a decree affirming a decree of the District Court, 37 F.2d 385, dismissing a suit to enjoin alleged infringement of a patent.

BRANDEIS, J., lead opinion

MR. JUSTICE BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the court.

The Permutit Company is the owner of Gans patent No. 1,195,923, for an apparatus for softening water, applied for August 5, 1911, and granted August 22, 1916. It brought, on February 23, 1928, this suit in the federal court for northern Illinois against Graver Corporation to enjoin infringement of claims 1 and 5. The defendant denied both the validity of the patent and the infringement. The District Court held both claims invalid, 37 F.2d 385. The Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed that decision, and also held that the

Page 54

defendant's "presently used structures" do not infringe Claim 5, 43 F.2d 898. Certiorari was granted because of conflict with earlier decisions in other circuits.1

Water is hard because it contains the salts of calcium and magnesium. It may be softened by distillation or by adding to the water certain other chemicals through which the hardening constituents in solution are changed to an insoluble form and precipitated. Such softening may also be effected by the use of zeolite, a hydrated alumino-silicate found in nature. When hard water is passed through zeolites, they give up their sodium to the water, and take from it the calcium and magnesium as a new base. Zeolites have the peculiar quality that, after becoming exhausted in such use, they may be regenerated by passing a solution of common salt through them, whereupon they give up their new base of calcium and magnesium and take back their sodium base. They retain indefinitely these valuable properties.

The chemical attributes of zeolites and their effect upon hard water had been known long before the application for the patent in suit. But zeolites were not employed commercially as a water softener because, as then found in nature, they were ill adapted for use in filters, and the expense of mining them was large. Gans invented a process for producing artificial zeolites and a process of softening water by means of them. The United States patents issued for those inventions had expired before

Page 55

the commencement of this suit, which is upon a patent for an apparatus

in which the zeolites or alumino-silicates can be used in a filter and be regenerated therein so as to be capable of continuous use for the softening of water.

The essential elements of the water softening process in which this apparatus is employed are the passage of water through zeolites, their regeneration by recharging them with the sodium chloride solution, [52 S.Ct. 54] and the rinsing of them thereafter, so that no noticeable tinge of salt will be found in the filtered water. A drawing was...

To continue reading