First National Bank of Montgomery v. United States

Decision Date23 January 1961
Docket NumberNo. 18450.,18450.
Citation285 F.2d 123
PartiesFIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MONTGOMERY, Executor, Estate of Georgia S. Gossler, Deceased, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Robert D. Thorington, Wm. S. Duke, Montgomery, Ala., for appellant.

Morton K. Rothschild, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Albert E. Byrne, Asst. U. S. Atty., Hartwell Davis, U. S. Atty., Montgomery, Ala., Charles K Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, C. Guy Tadlock, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, JONES, Circuit Judge, and MIZE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

We find ourselves in agreement with the opinion of the district court. First National Bank of Montgomery v. United States, D.C., 176 F.Supp. 768. For the reasons there stated, its judgment is

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • Second National Bank of New Haven v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Connecticut
    • 25 Julio 1963
    ...210 F.2d 792 (2 Cir. 1954); First National Bank of Montgomery v. United States, 176 F.Supp. 768, 772-775 (M.D. Ala.1959), aff'd, 285 F.2d 123 (5 Cir. 1961); See 10 Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, § 61.03 (Zimet Rev.) (1958). 43 Darlington's Estate v. Commissioner, 302 F.2d 693, 694......
  • Peyton's Estate v. CIR
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • 15 Octubre 1963
    ...77 S.Ct. 100, 1 L.Ed.2d 79; First Nat'l Bank of Montgomery v. United States, 176 F.Supp. 768, 773-775 (M.D.Ala. 1959), affirmed 285 F.2d 123 (5 Cir., 1961). In appropriate fact situations courts have not hesitated to conclude that disqualifying collusion did not exist and to recognize the s......
  • Brown v. U.S.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 13 Diciembre 1989
    ...S.Ct. 707, 709, 1 L.Ed.2d 746 (1957); First Nat'l Bank of Montgomery v. United States, 176 F.Supp. 768, 772 (M.D.Ala.1959), aff'd, 285 F.2d 123 (5th Cir.1961). Moreover, as to the question of whether an estate's administration had been "unduly prolonged," it is not surprising that the IRS m......
  • Willamette Valley Lumber Co. v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Oregon
    • 23 Febrero 1966
    ...Bond Corp., 41 T.C. 20 (1963); First Nat'l Bank of Montgomery v. United States, 176 F. Supp. 768 (M.D.Ala.1959), aff'd per curiam 285 F.2d 123 (5th Cir. 1951), and the Government is free to determine deficiencies for prior years, if a new and correct determination relates to a question of l......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT