State of Wisconsin v. State of Illinois State of Michigan v. Same State of New York v. Same, s. 5
Citation | 53 S.Ct. 210,287 U.S. 578,77 L.Ed. 506 |
Decision Date | 19 December 1932 |
Docket Number | 8,Nos. 5,s. 5 |
Parties | STATE OF WISCONSIN et al., Complainants, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS and Sanitary District of Chicago et al. STATE OF MICHIGAN et al., Complainants, v. SAME. STATE OF NEW YORK et al., Complainants, v. SAME. , and 9, Original |
Court | United States Supreme Court |
(1) As to the causes of the delay in obtaining approval of the construction of controlling works in the Chicago river and the steps which should now be taken to secure such approval and prompt construction;
(2) As to the causes of the delay in providing for the construction of the Southwest Side Treatment Works and the steps which should now be taken for such construction , in case of a change in site, for the construction of an adequate substitute;
(3) As to the financial measures on the part of the Sanitary District or the State of Illinois which are reasonable and necessary in order to carry out the decree of this Court.
The special master shall have authority to proceed promptly and summarily in making said inquiry and (1) to employ competent stenographic and clerical assistants, (2) to fix the times and places of taking the evidence, and (3) to issue subpoenas to secure the attendance of witnesses, including those of his own selection, and to administer oaths. When the report of the special master is filed, the clerk of the Court shall cause the same to be printed, and the Court, without the filing of exceptions, will appoint a day for hearing the parties thereon, as the Court may be advised.
The special master shall be allowed his actual expenses and a reasonable compensation for his services to be fixed hereafter by the Court. The allowances to him, the compensation paid to his stenographic and clerical assistants, and the cost of printing his report shall be charged against...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sorrells v. United States
... ... an ex-service man and a former member of the same Division, which was ture. Witness asked defendant ... of liquor for which the witness paid defendant $5. Martin also testifed that he was 'the first and ... 341, 36 Am.St.Rep. 295; Williams v. State of Georgia, 55 Ga. 391; United States v ... ...
-
United States v. Abbadessa
... ... " passing through town on their way to New York who had approximately five pounds of Mexican ... in drugs — beyond an admitted prior state conviction — by Furstenberg's testimony that he ... not required to repeat them in precisely the same form. Generally this may be desirable to avoid ... of the defense as well as of the prosecution.5 ... After deliberating for ... ...
-
State of Wisconsin v. State of Illinois State of Michigan v. Same State of New York v. Same
...sanitary district or the state of Illinois which are reasonable and necessary in order to carry out the decree of the court. 287 U.S. 578, 53 S.Ct. 210, 77 L.Ed. —-. The master has proceeded accordingly, and, after full hearing and careful review of the evidence received by him, has submitt......