Smith v. State
| Decision Date | 08 January 1974 |
| Docket Number | No. 73--360,73--360 |
| Citation | 288 So.2d 522 |
| Parties | Reba Louise SMITH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Mark King Leban, Asst. Public Defender, and Kurt Marmar, Legal Intern, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and J. Robert Olian, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
Defendant-appellant was informed against, tried by jury, convicted, and sentenced to ten (10) years in the state penitentiary for manslaughter.
Appellant raises two points on appeal, (1) the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress her confession without an unequivocal and explicit finding of voluntariness, and (2) the trial court erred in denying the above motion where there was no clear showing of a knowing and intelligent waiver of the defendant's constitutional rights.
As to the first point, we find McDole v. State, Fla.1973, 283 So.2d 553 to be controlling. In McDole, the Supreme Court first quoted Sims v. Georgia, 385 U.S. 538, 87 S.Ct. 639, 17 L.Ed.2d 593 (1967), which held that a trial judge need not make formal findings of fact or write an opinion with respect to the voluntariness of a confession, but his conclusion that a confession is voluntary must appear from the record with unmistakable clarity. Thereupon, the court determined that such 'unmistakable clarity' does not appear simply from the trial judge's statement that the motion to suppress the confession is denied as was done in the case sub judice.
Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and sentence herein appealed and remand the cause for a new trial.
Reversed and remanded.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Peterson v. State
...(Fla.3d DCA 1975); Walker v. State, 311 So.2d 768 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); Graham v. State, 292 So.2d 373 (Fla.3d DCA 1974); Smith v. State, 288 So.2d 522 (Fla.3d DCA 1974); Knight v. State, 373 So.2d 52 (Fla.4th DCA 1979); Bullard v. State, 358 So.2d 48 (Fla.4th DCA 1978); Greene v. State, 351 S......
-
Wainwright v. Sykes
...v. State, Fla.1973, 283 So.2d 553; Reddish v. State, Fla.1964,167 So.2d 858; Young v. State, Fla.1962, 140 So.2d 97; Smith v. State, 3rd Fla.D.C.A.1974, 288 So.2d 522; Dodd v. State, 4th Fla.D.C.A.1970, 232 So.2d II. WAIVER Appellee argues that not only did the state fail to carry its burde......
-
Wilson v. State, 45690
...Fla.App.1970, 232 So.2d 235; State v. Stone, Fla.App.1973, 279 So.2d 351; State v. Harris, Fla.App.1973, 276 So.2d 845; Smith v. State, Fla.App.1974, 288 So.2d 522; and McDole v. State, Fla.1973, 283 So.2d 553), nevertheless, there are many instances in an evidentiary hearing where certain ......
-
Trolinger v. State
...and intelligently waived his constitutional rights. Unlike the situation in McDole v. State, Fla.1973, 283 So.2d 553; Smith v. State, Fla.App.3d, 1974, 288 So.2d 522, and Graham v. State, Fla.App.3d 1974, 292 So.2d 373, where the court merely stated that the motion to suppress the confessio......