29 A.D.2d 769, Levine v. Levine

Citation:29 A.D.2d 769, 288 N.Y.S.2d 862
Party Name:Levine v. Levine
Case Date:February 13, 1968
Court:New York Supreme Court Appelate Division, Second Department

Page 769

29 A.D.2d 769

288 N.Y.S.2d 862

Janet LEVINE, Appellant-Respondent,

v.

Morris LEVINE, Respondent-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

February 13, 1968.

Finkelstein, Robinson & Rothenberg, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant-respondent; Sidney Rothenberg, New York City, on the brief.

William B. Sandler, New York City, for defendant-respondent- [288 N.Y.S.2d 863] appellant; Leonard H. Sandler, New York City, of counsel.

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 8, 1967, reversed, without costs, and motion and cross motion remitted to the Special Term for (1) a plenary hearing as to the present financial resources and needs of the parties and the children and all other facts relevant to whether any modifications of the alimony and support provisions of the judgment of separation are warranted and (2) a determination De novo upon these issues and the matter of counsel fees. In our opinion, the conflicting affidavits and exhibits submitted are insufficient to support a determination; and a hearing is essential to develop all of the relevant facts (Sloan v. Sloan, 29 A.D.2d 571, 286 N.Y.S.2d 501 dec.Dec. 29, 1967; Oreste v. Oreste, 27 A.D.2d 560, 277 N.Y.S.2d 608; Alpert v. Alpert, 20 A.D.2d 560, 245 N.Y.S.2d 902; Peters v. Peters,

Page 770

14 A.D.2d...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP