Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. United States

Decision Date06 November 1939
Docket NumberNo. 43188.,43188.
Citation29 F. Supp. 876
PartiesHARRIS TRUST & SAVINGS BANK et al. v. UNITED STATES.
CourtU.S. Claims Court

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

Albert H. Veeder, of Chicago, Ill. (Francis E. Baldwin and Henry Veeder, both of Chicago, Ill., on the briefs), for plaintiffs.

J. H. Sheppard, of Washington, D. C., and Samuel O. Clark, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Robert N. Anderson and Fred K. Dyar, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., on the briefs), for the United States.

Before WHALEY, Chief Justice, and GREEN, LITTLETON, WILLIAMS, and WHITAKER, Judges.

WHITAKER, Judge.

The question here involved is whether or not a certain trust executed by the decedent on June 12, 1930, was executed in contemplation of death, in the sense that phrase is used in Section 302 (c) of the Revenue Act of 1926, 44 Stat. 70, 26 U.S. C.A. § 411(c).

On this date of June 12, 1930, the decedent executed an irrevocable trust to the Chicago Title and Trust Company, as trustee, providing for the transfer to it, in trust, of municipal bonds of the approximate face value of $850,000. This was approximately equal to the value of the property remaining in the decedent's hands at the time of his death.

At the time of the execution of the trust the decedent was about 70 years of age and was suffering from arteriosclerosis and myocardial degeneration. He died on January 22, 1933, about two years and six months after the execution of the trust, from angina pectoris. At the time of the execution of the trust instrument there were no symptoms of this disease.

Upon discovering that decedent was suffering from arteriosclerosis and myocardial degeneration, his physician put him to bed and allowed him to take no exercise whatever, not even to the extent of going to the bathroom. He was so confined for six weeks. After the lapse of this time he was permitted to get up and gradually increase his physical activities, and after several weeks more he was permitted to go to his summer home in Wequetonsing, Michigan, and to resume the playing of golf, of which he was very fond.

The trust was executed while the decedent was under the care of his physician, but apparently after the first six weeks of absolute quiet.

Although his physician had prescribed such a complete cessation of physical activity, the decedent, to all outward appearances, at any rate, was not at all alarmed about his physical condition; but, on the contrary, treated it lightly, and insisted that it was foolish for him to be put to bed.

Myocardial degeneration is a curable disease. The treatment for it is complete rest.

The execution of this trust was not first conceived while the decedent was confined to his bed in 1930, but had been previously discussed by him with members of his family, his lawyers, and others as far back as 1926 or 1927, at a time when he was in good health.

In 1926 or 1927 his declared motive for contemplating the execution of a trust instrument was twofold. It was, first, in order to relieve himself of the burden of keeping track of his securities, and to insure an income for himself and family during his lifetime. Secondly, it was for the purpose of putting the management of his property after his death in the hands of those whom he considered more capable than his wife and daughter, and thus to insure an income for them after his death.

When he actually executed the trust the only reason he assigned for doing so was that he desired to shift from himself to others who had the necessary statistical facilities the burden of keeping track of the interest payments and the substitutions that should be made from time to time. No doubt he was actuated in part also by...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Hoover v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Claims Court
    • 20 Enero 1960
    ...that might have occurred to him were purely incidental." 32 F.Supp. at page 888, 91 Ct.Cl. at page 248. In Harris Trust and Savings Bank v. United States, 29 F.Supp. 876, 90 Ct.Cl. 17, although decedent, when in good health, contemplated the creation of the trust in question in order to rel......
  • Russell v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Claims Court
    • 5 Mayo 1941
    ...States, 2 F.Supp. 1000, 77 Ct.Cl. 429, certiorari denied, 292 U.S. 629, 54 S.Ct. 628, 78 L.Ed. 1483; Harris Trust & Savings Bank et al. v. United States, 29 F.Supp. 876, 90 Ct.Cl. 17, certiorari denied, 310 U.S. 632, 60 S.Ct. 1074, 84 L.Ed. The determination of the Commissioner of Internal ......
  • Griffith v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Claims Court
    • 6 Mayo 1940
    ...that it cannot be said that the decedent in making transfers did so in contemplation of death. Harris Trust & Savings Bank et al. v. United States, 90 Ct.Cl. ___, 29 F.Supp. 876. Judgment will be entered in favor of plaintiff for $11,818.31 with interest as provided by law. It is so ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT