People v. Peery
| Decision Date | 26 April 1973 |
| Docket Number | No. 56970,56970 |
| Citation | 11 Ill.App.3d 730,297 N.E.2d 643 |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Major PEERY, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | United States Appellate Court of Illinois |
Charlotte Adelman, Chicago, for defendant-appellant.
Robin Auld, Asst. State's Atty., Chicago, for plaintiff-appellee.
The defendant, Major Peery, was indicted for the murder of his wife (Ill.Rev.Stat.1969, ch. 38, par. 9--1), and after a jury trial he was convicted and sentenced to the Illinois State Penitentiary for a term of 100 to 150 years. In this appeal the defendant alleges that three instances of reversible error occurred during the trial and also that the sentence he received was excessive. The most important issue raised by the defendant, because it is dispositive of this case, is whether the trial court erred in refusing to give the defendant's offered jury instruction encompassing the lesser included offense of voluntary manslaughter.
We reverse and remand.
The relevant facts adduced at trial are as follows: The defendant and his wife, Lovell Peery, had been married for 18 years at the time of the alleged offense. During their marriage they had seven children, and an eighth, Henry Williams, Jr., was Mrs. Peery's son born of a previous marriage. Sometime during February, 1971, the defendant and his wife separated and lived apart until the end of March.
On the evening of March 31, 1971, Lovell Peery was visiting her daughter and son-in-law, Gail and Timothy Jackson, at their home a short distance away from the Peery family home, where the defendant and one of his daughters still resided. In the kitchen of the Jackson home that evening were Mr. and Mrs. Jackson, Mrs. Peery and two of her daughters, Margaret and Tujuana Peery. Shortly after 7:00 p.m. or 8:00 p.m. Patricia Peery, a fourth daughter of the defendant and Lovell Peery, rang the doorbell at the Jackson apartment. Particia had encountered her father, the defendant, while on her way to her sister's home, and he had told her that he also was on his way to the Jacksons' to bring Margaret back to live with him.
Patricia further testified that she and her father proceeded together to the Jacksons', and as she rang the doorbell, the defendant stood behind her and out of sight. When Gail opened the door, the defendant ran through the door and pushed his way to the kitchen. Patricia followed him as far as the living room and observed the ensuing events from there.
Timothy Jackson testified that he was in the kitchen when the defendant entered and observed the following events. Lovell Peery was standing, with her arms folded, in the corner near the kitchen sink. The defendant positioned himself against a wall a few feet away from her. After the defendant entered, he and Mrs. Peery began to argue about family matters. The exchange grew louder until Gail Jackson cautioned her mother to keep her voice down. Jackson testified that the defendant continued in a loud voice demanding to know why his wife was keeping the children from him. The defendant also accused his wife of staying out with other men, which she denied. Jackson further testified that suddenly, for no explainable reason, the defendant said, 'Why are you goint into the sink?', and drew a pocket knife, crossed the room in three quick steps and began stabbing Mrs. Peery.
Gail Jackson testified that after entering the apartment the defendant proceeded to the kitchen and began arguing with her mother. The defendant accused his wife of keeping the children from him. He had arrived angry, but he calmed down during the conversation. He made no threats to Mas. Peery during their conversation. Then, suddenly, he asked, 'What are you going to the sink for?' He then approached Mrs. Peery and began stabbing her with a knife he took from his pocket.
Patricia Peery testified that she observed the events as they occurred, and she recounted substantially the same story. Her father was speaking in a normal tone, and then he asked her mother why she was going to the sink. He then walked to the sink, grabbed her and started stabbing her.
The testimony of Margaret Peery was similar to that of the previous occurrence witnesses. She heard her father say something like, 'Why are you going into the sink?' She added that the sink had contained, among other things, a knife.
At this point, as the defendant approached his wife, the witnesses realized what was happening and naturally became quite exicted. The girls began screaming, 'Daddy, Mama, stop; Daddy and Mother, stop.' Patricia Peery hit the defendant on the head with a large kitchen spoon; Gail Peery hit him with a kitchen chair. Timothy Jackson got the girls out of the apartment as the defendant continued to stab his victim.
Minutes afterwards, the defendant left the Jackson apartment and walked to his home. The police were called, and he was arrested. He was taken to a nearby hospital where he received five stitches to close a cut on his head.
Dr. Jerry Kearns testified that he was the pathologist who examined the body of Lovell Peery. He found two stab wounds, one to the chest and one to the neck, which were the cause of death.
The defense called as its only witness the defendant. He testified that he went to the Jackson home on the evening of March 31, 1971, to tell his wife that he wanted the children to live with him. He further testified that after their conversation, he turned to leave when his wife calld his name and said, 'Anyway, I made up my mind to kill you.' She reached into the sink, and he asked, 'What are you reaching into the sink for?' She then raised her arm over her head and struck him on the head with a heavy object. The blow blined him. The next thing he could remember was that he was outside walking home. He was bleeding from the top of his head. When he got home, he...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
U.S. ex rel. Peery v. Sielaff
...on appeal due to the trial court's erroneous rejection of Peery's proposed instructions on voluntary manslaughter. 11 Ill.App.3d 730, 297 N.E.2d 643 (1st Dist. 1973). At his retrial, Peery again proffered instructions on voluntary manslaughter. The trial court tendered the instruction on vo......
-
People v. Perry
...Ruel (1970), 120 Ill.App.2d 374, 256 N.E.2d 672; People v. Dewey (1969), 42 Ill.2d 148, 246 N.E.2d 232.' (Also see People v. Peery (1973), 11 Ill.App.3d 730, 297 N.E.2d 643.) Thus, the specific issue for our determination is whether there is evidence in the record upon which the jury could ......
-
People v. Farmer
... ... (I.L.P. Homicide § 132; People v. Ryan, 9 Ill.2d 467, 138 N.E.2d 516, 521; People v. Dortch, 20 Ill.App.3d 911, 314 N.E.2d 324) ... In People v. Peery, 11 Ill.App.3d 730, 297 N.E.2d 643, defendant was [50 Ill.App.3d 115] convicted of stabbing his wife. Defendant and his wife were arguing. Defendant testified that he had no memory of stabbing his wife but he did remember that she threatened to kill him and that she reached into the sink and ... ...
-
People v. Jenkins
...491, 187 N.E.2d 243 (evidence that at time of killing deceased may have been armed with a hammer or hatchet or both); People v. Peery, 11 Ill.App.3d 730, 297 N.E.2d 643 (testimony of defendant that deceased reached into sink and hit him with heavy object just before the stabbing); People v.......