Murray v. Marsh

Decision Date31 December 1803
Citation3 N.C. 290
PartiesMURRAY & MURRAY v. MARSH & MARSH.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

1. A bankrupt who endorsed a note before his bankruptcy, and who has obtained his certificate, is a good witness for the endorsee.

2. a record of the proceedings against a bankrupt, attested by the clerk of the District Court, is good evidence; the act of Congress not requiring the certificate of the presiding Judge in the case of records from United States' Courts.

3. If the objection to a witness arises from proof made by the objector, the witness cannot discharge himself of the objection by any matter sworn by himself; it must be removed by proof drawn from some other source.

4. Depositions which do not shew, either in the caption or body of them, between what parties they were taken, cannot be received.

5. If a plaintiff, supposing himself ready, press a trial, and it is found on the trial that the testimony he relied On, cannot be given in evidence as he expected, and he be nonsuited, the allegation of surprise shall not prevail to set aside the non-suit.

Per Curiam. MARSHALL, Chief Justice, and POTTER, Judges. Loomis and Tillinghast assigned to the plaintiffs the note sued on, which was made by the defendants, and afterwards became bankrupts, and obtained a certificate.—And now Loomis is offered as a witness for the plaintiffs. He is a competent witness; for he is by the certificate discharged of all debts proveable under the commission, and his endorsement to the plaintiffs rendered him liable to them, so as to make their demand against him. Secondly; the record of the proceedings against them, attested by the clerk of the district court, without any certificate of the presiding Judge, is good evidence; for the act of Congress relates to certificates in case of officers of the several States, not to those of the United States. Thirdly; if the objection to a witness arises from proof made by the objector, the witness cannot discharge himself of the objection, by any matter sworn by himself; it must be removed by proof drawn from some other source Fourthly; depositions taken, not specifying the parties between whom they are taken in the caption, nor naming them as parties in the body

of the deposition, cannot be received. Fifthly; if a plaintiff supposing himself ready, press for trial, and it is found on trial that the testimony be relied on cannot be given in evidence as he expected and he be nonsuited, the allegation of surprise shall not...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT