Rine v. Boles

Decision Date14 June 1962
Docket NumberNo. 8614.,8614.
Citation305 F.2d 375
PartiesWilliam D. RINE, Appellant, v. Otto C. BOLES, Warden, West Virginia State Penitentiary, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit

Fred N. Sigman, Jr., Asheville, N. C. (Court-assigned counsel), for appellant.

William D. Rine, pro se, on brief.

Andrew J. Goodwin, Asst. Atty. Gen. of West Virginia (C. Donald Robertson, Atty. Gen. of West Virginia, on brief), for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and LARKINS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the memorandum opinion of the District Judge, 206 F.Supp. 380, dated January 29, 1962, and considering, too, the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Gallegos v. Colorado, 82 S.Ct. 1209, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Brown v. Turner
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of North Carolina
    • 4 Agosto 1966
    ... ... State of North Carolina, 252 F.Supp. 298 (M.D.N.C.1966); Petway v. Stallings, 248 F.Supp. 991 (E.D.N.C.1965); United States ex rel. Rine v. Boles, 206 F.Supp. 380 (N.D.W.Va.1962), aff'd in 305 F.2d 375 (4th Cir. 1962) ...         From an examination of the record it is clear ... ...
  • State v. Gullings
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • 14 Julio 1966
    ... ... 1541, 6 L.Ed.2d 948 (1961); or Haley v. State of Ohio, 332 U.S. 596, 68 S.Ct. 302, 92 L.Ed. 224 (1948) ... 6 United States ex rel. Rine v. Boles, 305 F.2d 375 (4th Cir.), affirming 206 F.Supp. 380 (N.D.W.Va.), cert. den. 371 U.S. 868, 83 S.Ct. 130, 9 L.Ed.2d 104 (1962); Roberts v ... ...
  • Satterfield v. Boles
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of West Virginia
    • 7 Agosto 1967
    ... ... Even if Satterfield is correct in the allegations of misconduct which he makes, he still must demonstrate that the misconduct in some way affected his two guilty pleas. Bloombaum v. United States, 211 F.2d 944 (4th Cir. 1954); United States ex rel. Rine v. Boles, 206 F.Supp. 380 (N.D.W.Va.1962), aff'd 305 F.2d 375 (4th Cir. 1962); Brown v. Turner, 257 F.Supp. 734 (E.D.N.C.1966). And this Satterfield has not attempted to do ...         Two able attorneys were appointed to represent Satterfield after he was indicted, and he testified at the ... ...
  • Dixon v. Bailey
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of North Carolina
    • 11 Agosto 1965
    ... ... Cerniglia v. United States, 230 F.Supp. 932 (N.D.Ill.1964) and cases cited therein; and United States ex rel. Rine v. Boles, 206 F.Supp. 380 (N.D.W. Va.1962), affirmed in 305 F.2d 375 (4th Cir., 1962) ...         The record, petition and response indicate ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT