Merrick v. AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE ASS'N., 64662.
Decision Date | 15 January 1940 |
Docket Number | No. 64662.,64662. |
Citation | 31 F. Supp. 876 |
Parties | MERRICK v. AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE ASS'N. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Columbia |
Richard L. Merrick, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.
Charles C. Collins, of Washington, D. C., for defendant.
5. That, as shown by 2, defendant now advertises to its members and prospective members that it will furnish, among others, the following services to individuals who become members of said organization:
Opinion.I think that the conduct of the defendant set out in subsections "a" and "b" of Section 5 of the agreed statement of facts constitutes the unauthorized practice of the law. I do not think that subsections "c" and "d" do. As to the remaining category of section 5, I think that the language is too broad, for it would include any case in which the defendant thought that one of its members had been wronged. On the other hand, if confined to cases which involve an illegal course of conduct which may involve several members of defendant association, such as the case referred to in the stipulation where a judicial officer heard cases involving members of the defendant in which the judge was financially interested in the result of the case, I think the practice of defendant in employing counsel should be encouraged.
I think that the filling out of blank complaints to be filed in the Small Claims Court constitutes the practice of law.
I think that the conducting of the Department of Claims and Adjustment constitutes the practice of law.
To continue reading
Request your trial- American Automobile Ass'n v. Merrick
-
GS Suppicer Co. v. Morton Salt Co., 246.
... ... American Lecithin Company v. Warfield Company, 7 Cir., 105 F.2d 207 ... ...