ALLIED ARTISTS PICTURES CORPORATION v. Giroux
Decision Date | 02 February 1970 |
Docket Number | No. 68-Civ. 2462.,68-Civ. 2462. |
Citation | 312 F. Supp. 450 |
Parties | ALLIED ARTISTS PICTURES CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Claude A. GIROUX, Defendant. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York |
Hughes, Hubbard & Reed, New York City, for plaintiff; by Robert J. Sisk, Douglas F. Eaton, New York City, of counsel.
Epstein & Furman, New York City, for defendant; by Bernard Furman, New York City, of counsel.
MEMORANDUM
Plaintiff, Allied Artists Pictures Corporation Allied brings this action under Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78p(b), against defendant Claude A. Giroux Giroux, the former chairman of Allied. Plaintiff seeks to recover "short swing" profits from Giroux who was the owner of more than ten percent of Allied's preferred stock at the time in question.
During the fall of 1967, certain controversies took place among Allied, the present management of that corporation and its former management (including defendant Giroux). Those controversies were resolved on October 16, 1967, at which time Allied gave defendant a general release.
The record indicates all parties to the settlement were aware that defendant held a large percentage of Preferred Stock in Allied, that he wanted to sell this stock, and that in order to do so lawfully, he might need a registration statement. Allied agreed to file such a registration statement if one were required. Subsequently, Giroux sold some of his stock without a registration statement in violation of § 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
In his answer filed on June 12, 1969, Giroux asserts four affirmative defenses and a counterclaim for indemnification. The third and fourth defenses as well as the counterclaim, which are now at issue, are premised on allegations that Allied understood that Giroux "might wish promptly to sell shares of plaintiff's stock," and that Allied agreed that any such sales would not entitle Allied to recover any of the profits.
Giroux's third affirmative defense, based on an alleged waiver and release, claims that it was defendant's understanding that he could make sales of Allied's stock and that "said release was intended to constitute a waiver and release of any claims such as that which plaintiff now attempts to assert."
The fourth affirmative defense, based on estoppel, refers to the above-mentioned settlement and alleges that it was the agreement of the parties that Giroux could sell shares of Allied's stock free of the claims made herein.
In the counterclaim for indemnification, alleged as an alternative to the third and fourth defenses, Giroux claims that if it is held that Allied did not or could not release the claims now made by it, defendant "is entitled to judgment and/or an offset against plaintiff in precisely the same amount as any recovery which plaintiff is found to be entitled to under the cause of action asserted in its complaint."
The present motion brought on by plaintiff seeks an order:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Schur v. Salzman
...Can Co., Inc., 231 F.2d 843 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 972, 76 S.Ct. 1031, 100 L.Ed. 1490 (1956); Allied Artists Pictures Corp. v. Giroux, 312 F.Supp. 450, 451 (S.D.N.Y.1970); Jefferson Lake Sulphur Co. v. Walet, 104 F.Supp. 20, 23 (E. D.La.1952), aff'd, 202 F.2d 433 (5th Cir.), cert......
-
In re Xo Communications, Inc.
...pre-litigation release of its former chairman from Section 16(b) liability claim, the district court in Allied Artists Pictures Corp. v. Giroux, 312 F.Supp. 450 (S.D.N.Y.1970) noted that "[a] corporation is prohibited by Section 29(a) of the ... Exchange Act ... from waiving compliance with......
-
Tyco Laboratories, Inc. v. Cutler-Hammer, Inc.
...Schur v. Salzman, 365 F.Supp. 725, 733 (S.D.N.Y.1973) (shortswing transaction participated in by issuer); Allied Artists Pictures Corp. v. Giroux, 312 F.Supp. 450, 451 (S.D.N.Y.1970) (shortswing transaction benefited issuer); Volk v. Zlotoff, 285 F.Supp. 650, 655-56 (S.D.N.Y. 1968) (short-s......
-
Ging v. Parker-Hunter Inc., Civ. A. No. 79-489
...Act of 1933, § 14, 15 U.S.C. 77n; See Wilko v. Swan, 346 U.S. 427, 74 S.Ct. 182, 98 L.Ed. 168 (1953); Allied Artists Pictures Corp. v. Giroux, 312 F.Supp. 450 (S.D.N.Y. 1970). The defendant argues, however, that it has a claim for indemnity in two situations. First, if a plaintiff should fa......
-
How The SEC's New Clawback Rules Could Operate In Practice: A Hypothetical
...29(a) in rejecting indemnification against Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 304 liability); and Allied Artists Pictures Corp. v. Giroux, 312 F. Supp. 450 (S.D.N.Y. 1970) (Section 29(a) rendered general release given by corporation to former chairman 'unenforceable as a matter of law' in action by......