Marshall v. United States, 7330.

Citation321 F.2d 897
Decision Date19 July 1963
Docket NumberNo. 7330.,7330.
PartiesRichard L. MARSHALL, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)

Frank C. McKibben, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

Jack R. Parr, Asst. U. S. Atty. (B. Andrew Potter, U. S. Atty., was with him on the brief), for appellee.

Before PICKETT, BREITENSTEIN, and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Marshall has appealed for the second time from the denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He again attacks the validity of the sentence imposed but this was determined adversely to him on his prior appeal. Marshall v. United States, 10 Cir., 299 F.2d 141, certiorari denied 370 U.S. 958, 82 S.Ct. 1606, 8 L.Ed.2d 824. Additionally he asserts that he was unconstitutionally denied counsel at the time of his first arraignment.

The record shows that at arraignment the court advised Marshall of his right to counsel and Marshall replied that he was thinking about hiring a lawyer whom he named. The court then inquired of Marshall whether he wanted to proceed or wait. Marshall replied: "Well, just as well plead not guilty at the present." Later a lawyer was appointed and Marshall changed his plea to guilty. In the circumstances no prejudice appears. Cf. Crooker v. California, 357 U.S. 433, 439, 440, 78 S.Ct. 1287, 2 L.Ed.2d 1448; Latham v. Crouse, 10 Cir., 320 F.2d 120.

In the brief of counsel appointed by this court to represent Marshall on this appeal the claim is made that Marshall was not represented by effective counsel at the time of his change of plea and sentence. This contention was not raised by the motion under § 2255 and was not considered by the trial court. It may not now be raised for the first time on appeal. Way v. United States, 10 Cir., 276 F.2d 912, 913; Richardson v. United States, 10 Cir., 199 F.2d 333, 335.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Chin Kee v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 7193.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (1st Circuit)
    • June 23, 1969
    ...g., Black v. United States, 348 F.2d 159 (9th Cir. 1965); Johnson v. United States, 333 F.2d 371 (10th Cir. 1964); Marshall v. United States, 321 F.2d 897 (10th Cir. 1963). 1 The factual background in Hamilton sheds considerable light on the Court's unanimity in refusing to require proof of......
  • Gueldner v. Heyd
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • April 21, 1970
    ...of the proceedings. Cf. Latham v. Crouse (10CA), 320 F.2d 120, cert. den. 375 U.S. 959, 84 S.Ct. 449, 11 L. Ed. 317; and Marshall v. United States (10CA), 321 F.2d 897." We hold that Charbonnet was not denied his federal constitutional Sixth Amendment right to counsel when he was arraigned ......
  • United States v. Briscoe, 20028.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • July 14, 1970
    ...1968); Wilkins v. United States, 351 F. 2d 609 (5 Cir. 1965); Bush v. United States, 347 F.2d 231 (6 Cir. 1965); Marshall v. United States, 321 F.2d 897 (10 Cir. 1963); Flynn v. United States, 222 F.2d 541 (9 Cir. 1955). In the event the trial court disallows the withdrawal of the plea the ......
  • Burns v. United States
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • August 26, 1963
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT