Ford v. Hubbard
Citation | 330 F.3d 1086 |
Decision Date | 06 September 2002 |
Docket Number | No. 98-80603.,No. 98-56587.,No. 98-80582.,No. 98-56455.,No. 98-80477.,98-56455.,98-56587.,98-80477.,98-80582.,98-80603. |
Parties | Richard Herman FORD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. S. HUBBARD, Warden; Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees. Richard Herman Ford, Petitioner-Appellant, v. S. Hubbard, Warden; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees. Richard Herman Ford, Petitioner, v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Respondent, S. Hubbard, Warden, Real Party in Interest. Richard Herman Ford, Petitioner, v. S. Hubbard, Warden, Respondent. Richard Herman Ford, Petitioner, v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Respondent, S. Hubbard, Warden, Real Party in Interest. |
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) |
Lisa M. Bassis, Los Angeles, CA, for the petitioner-appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General for the State of California; David P. Druliner, Chief Assistant Attorney General; Carol Wendelin Pollack, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Steven D. Matthews, Supervising Deputy Attorney General; and Paul M. Roadarmel, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for the respondents-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Richard A. Paez, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. Nos. CV-97-03385-RAP/SH, CV-98-02556-RAP(SH), CV-98-02557-RAP-SH.
Before PREGERSON, REINHARDT and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge REINHARDT.
ORDER
The majority opinion filed September 6, 2002, and appearing at 305 F.3d 875 (9th Cir.2002), is hereby amended as follows:
1. slip op. at 13347, line 18 : after "See" and before the citation to James v. Pliler, insert "Kelly v. Small, 315 F.3d 1063, 1070-71 (9th Cir.2003);"
2. slip op. at 13347, line 18 : after the above new citation to Kelly v. Small, insert the following footnote:
3. slip op. at 13347, line 28 : after "(unless he could show that he was entitled to equitable tolling)," insert "See Valerio v. Crawford, 306 F.3d 742, 770-71 (9th Cir.2002) (en banc), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 123 S.Ct. 1788, 155 L.Ed.2d 695 (2003)."
4. slip op. at 13348, line 23 : after the citation to Anthony v. Cambra, insert ", cert. denied, 533 U.S. 941, 121 S.Ct. 2576, 150 L.Ed.2d 739 (2001)."
5. slip op. at 13348, line 26 : after the citation to Zarvela v. Artuz, insert ", cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1015, 122 S.Ct. 506, 151 L.Ed.2d 415."
6. slip op. at 13350, lines 10-11 : replace with
7. slip op. at 13353, n. 4, line 5 : replace "Miranda & Wong Sun" with "Miranda and Wong Sun"
8. slip op. at 13355, lines 14-15 : replace "Carey v. Saffold, 536 U.S. 214, 122 S.Ct. 2134, 153 L.Ed.2d 260 (June 17, 2002) (No. 01-301)." with "Carey v. Saffold, 536 U.S. 214, 122 S.Ct. 2134, 153 L.Ed.2d 260 (2002)."
9. slip op. at 13356, line 10 : after the citation to James v. Giles and before "see also Freeman v. Page," insert
10. slip op. at 13356, line 13 : after the citation to Freeman v. Page, insert ", cert. denied, 531 U.S. 946, 121 S.Ct. 345, 148 L.Ed.2d 277"
11. slip op. at 13357, n. 6, lines 8-9 : replace "Wyatt v. Terhune, 280 F.3d 1238, 1245-46 (9th Cir.2001)" with "Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1118-19 (9th Cir.2003)"
12. slip op. at 13358, line 20 : after "(quoting Freeman, 208 F.3d at 577)" and before "Thus, the district court, by failing to inform...", insert "; see also Kelly, 315 F.3d at 1070 ( )."
13. slip op. at 13358, line 36 : after "a denial of the request would likely constitute error," replace "See Zarvela" with
14. slip op. at 13359, lines 2-3 : replace "see also James, 269 F.3d at 1126" with "James, 269 F.3d at 1126"
15. slip op. at 13360, lines 30-31 : replace "What the district court should have told Ford," with
16. slip op. at 13361, line 7 : after
17. slip op. at 13361, n. 7, line 14 : after "absent equitable tolling," and before "To do otherwise," insert "See Valerio, 306 F.3d at 770-71."
18. slip op. at 13363, line 30 : after the citation to Van Tran v. Lindsey, insert ", cert. denied, 531 U.S. 944, 121 S.Ct. 340, 148 L.Ed.2d 274, overruled on other grounds by Lockyer v. Andrade, ___ U.S. ___, ___, 123 S.Ct. 1166, 155 L.Ed.2d 144 (2003)."
19. slip op. at 13364, n. 10 : replace n. 10 with "Compare Anthony, 236 F.3d at 574 ( ) and discussion supra Sections II.A. & II.B. ( with why Ford's initial habeas petitions were improperly dismissed)Anthony, 236 F.3d at 574 n. 1 ( )."
20. slip op. at 13364, n. 11, lines 1-3 : replace with "The petitioners in Green, Van Tran and Henry"
21. slip op. at 13366-67, n. 14, lines 11-14 : replace "; Jorss v. Gomez, 266 F.3d 955, 957-58 (9th Cir.2001) ( )." with".
22. slip op. at 13369, line 3 : after the citation to Miranda v. Castro, insert ", cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 123 S.Ct. 496, 154 L.Ed.2d 399"
23. slip op. at 13369, n. 18, line 4 : after the citation to Frye v. Hickman, insert ", cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1055, 122 S.Ct. 1913, 152 L.Ed.2d 823 (2002)"
24. slip op. at 13369, n. 18, line 6 : after the citation to Kreutzer v. Bowersox, insert ", cert. denied, 534 U.S. 863, 122 S.Ct. 145, 151 L.Ed.2d 97 (2001)"
25. slip op. at 13369, n. 18, line 9 : after the citation to United States v. Saro, insert ", cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1149, 122 S.Ct. 1111, 151 L.Ed.2d 1005 (2002)"
26. slip op. at 13369, line 7 : replace "Calderon v. United States District Court (Beeler)" with "Calderon v....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Anderson v. Morrow
...review in Pliler v. Ford, 540 U.S. 1099, 124 S.Ct. 981, 157 L.Ed.2d 811 (2004) (granting writ of certiorari to review Ford v. Hubbard, 330 F.3d 1086 (9th Cir.2003)). I proceed under the assumption that the most basic form of the procedure fleshed out in Kelly — a permissive stay by a distri......
-
Patterson v. Runnels
...be stayed and abeyed ("the stay and abey procedure") pending exhaustion of petitioner's grounds in state court. See Ford v. Hubbard, 330 F.3d 1086 (9th Cir. 2003). On July 17, 2003, a report and recommendation was filed recommending dismissal without prejudice for failure to exhaust state c......
-
U.S. v. Bendolph
...a warning deprived him of the opportunity to make a "meaningful" choice concerning his petition. Id. at 2445 (citing Ford v. Hubbard, 330 F.3d 1086, 1102 (9th Cir.2003)). The Supreme Court disagreed. It held that district courts need not warn pro se litigants that AEDPA's statute of limitat......
-
Wisenbaker v. Farwell
...Id. at 333. The Ninth Circuit has favorably cited this action by the Fifth Circuit, albeit only in dicta. See Ford v. Hubbard, 330 F.3d 1086, 1104 (9th Cir.2003). This Court finds Clifford to be persuasive.1 Therefore, this Court finds that Plaintiff could present facts that would prove the......