Dickson v. Waldron
Citation | 34 N.E. 506,135 Ind. 507 |
Decision Date | 07 June 1893 |
Docket Number | 15,934 |
Parties | Dickson et al. v. Waldron |
Court | Supreme Court of Indiana |
Reported at: 135 Ind. 507 at 524.
From the Marion Superior Court.
The judgment is affirmed.
W. H H. Miller, F. Winter, J. B. Elam, B. K. Elliott, W. F Elliott, P. Norton, R. O. Hawkins and H. C. Smith, for appellants.
O Gresham, J. B. Kealing and M. M. Hugg, for appellee.
On October 1, 1887, and at the time of the bringing of this suit, appellants were the lessees and managers of the Park Theater, in the city of Indianapolis. At the entrance to the theater, about three feet from the sidewalk, a flight of stairs ran up to a landing, at the rear of which was the box office for the sale of tickets. At either side of the landing a flight of stairs led up to the east and west entrance doors to the theater. At the top of the first flight of stairs, at the edge of the landing, gates were placed, four feet high, to keep the crowd back. Between these gates was an opening, where the chief officer of the theater, named Klingensmith, an employe of appellants, stood while the crowd was coming up, after which the gates were opened, and this officer went to keep order in the gallery.
Appellants also managed and controlled other theaters in Indianapolis and elsewhere, and, in their absence, John Dickson, brother of the appellant George A. Dickson, was the general manager of Park Theater, acting for appellants. He also assisted in selling tickets.
John M. Kiley was the head janitor of the theater, and lived, with his family, in the theater building. He was also doorkeeper, and stood at the west door, but could leave in case of emergency. At the request of appellants, he was granted special police powers by the metropolitan board of police of the city of Indianapolis, such powers to be exercised at the Park Theater. He received his pay from appellants. He had been in the employment of appellants at the theater before receiving his police powers, and his pay was not increased after receiving such powers. Appellants requested his appointment at the suggestion of the chief police officer, Klingensmith, for the purpose of assisting him in preserving order in the theater. He was not relieved of any of his duties in the theater after being appointed special policeman. His instructions from appellants were not to make any arrests, except to assist Klingensmith, unless otherwise ordered by appellants, or by John Dickson. In Klingensmith's absence, Kiley acted for him.
Joseph Gordon was treasurer and ticket seller for the theater.
On the evening of October 1, 1887, Joseph Gordon was in the box-office selling tickets. John Dickson was also in the box-office assisting in the sale of tickets.
On that evening appellee, who was a conductor on the Indianapolis, Decatur and Western Railroad, came with four friends to attend an entertainment at the theater. Appellee testifies that he went up stairs to the ticket office and called for a ten cent ticket; that he gave the ticket seller, Joseph Gordon, a silver dollar, and received from him his ticket and only seventy cents in change; and that another of the party, named Doran, also had some misunderstanding as to the purchase of his ticket.
The testimony of appellee then proceeds:
He testifies that the first blow was on the left forehead, which knocked him partly down on his left elbow; that when he attempted to rise Kiley struck him again; that altogether he was struck six times on the head, three times on the left shoulder, and twice on the left forearm; that during this time Kiley said nothing to him, but that he asked Kiley what he was beating him for, "and I said if he had anything to arrest me for, to arrest me, and for God's sake not to beat my brains out."
Somebody then interfered, and Kiley for the time withdrew, and then Gordon came out of the ticket office and grabbed appellee about the neck with his left arm, and began pounding him in the face with his fist, then knocked him down and kicked him two or three times; that Kiley then arrested him, and sent him to the police station.
The testimony of appellants' witnesses as to the transaction differs in almost all the details from that given by appellee, but not in the main facts; that is, the beating of appellee in front of the ticket office by Gordon and Kiley; that the quarrel resulted from disputes as to the purchase of tickets; that both assaults were made upon appellee before his arrest by Kiley, and that appellee did not strike either of his assailants.
The testimony of Joseph Gordon and John Kiley shows their treatment of appellee to have been most brutal. Gordon testifies that he and John Dickson were in the ticket office when appellee came up and threw down a silver dollar and asked for a ticket, not specifying what priced ticket; that he gave him his ticket and the proper change. His testimony then proceeds: "He," Waldron (appellee), That appellee then called him a vile name. That thereupon appellee repeated the vile name, and Gordon went out of the ticket office and attacked appellee. That there was nothing said between them after Gordon came out of the office. "Then we got on over to the stairway, and I hit him again, and got my arm around his neck, and we were about three or four steps down from the top. * * * I caught him around the neck with my arm and pulled him down. * * * I got him down on the stairway and hit him two or three times more, and I kicked him a couple of times. * * * I hit him in the face. * * * I hit him three or four times there, and kicked him, and then he said, 'I have enough.' * * * Mr. Kiley was down stairs at the time, out on the sidewalk. * * * I had quit when he halloed, 'I have enough.' * * * Kiley was coming up when he said that, and I said, 'Kiley, arrest this man.' When Kiley came up That when Kiley hit Waldron (appellee) the latter was
The witness Adkins, who was ticket-holder at the east door, testified:
Kiley himself testified that the appellant Henry M. Talbott, had instructed him that his "duties were to take tickets at the door and supervise the cleaning of the house and assist Mr. Klingensmith in making arrests, or preserving order." That sometimes, when employes would come to him and tell him that there was a disturbance in some part of the house, he would go there.
As to the disturbance, he testified:
"What did you do after striking Mr. Waldron?" "I arrested him."
John Dickson had remained, during the whole time, in the ticket office, and had seen the greater part of the conflict, as detailed by Gordon and Kiley, and, in his testimony, corroborates most of their statements.
He says: "I went on...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hogle v. Reliance Mfg. Co.
...the function of a police officer and when he is thus engaged he has stepped aside from his official position. Dickson et al. v. Waldron, 1893, 135 Ind. 507, 521, 34 N.E. 506, 35 N.E. 1, 24 L.R.A 483, 488, 41 Am.St.Rep. 440. “A public officer may, for certain purposes, be the servant of a pr......
-
Hogle v. Reliance Mfg. Co.
...function of a police officer and when he is thus engaged he has stepped aside from his official position. Dickson et al. v. Waldron, 1893, 135 Ind. 507, 521, 34 N.E. 506, 35 N.E. 1, 24 L.R.A 483, 488, 41 Am.St.Rep. 440. "A public officer may, for certain purposes, be servant of a private co......
- Dickson v. Waldron