United States v. People of State of Illinois
| Citation | 343 F.2d 120 |
| Decision Date | 22 March 1965 |
| Docket Number | No. 14822.,14822. |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Robert M. LEE, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PEOPLE OF the STATE OF ILLINOIS, City of Chicago Police Department et al., Defendants-Appellees. |
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit) |
Robert M. Lee, Jr., pro se.
William G. Clark, Atty. Gen., Chicago, Ill., Richard A. Michael, Edward A. Berman, Asst. Attys. Gen., of counsel, for defendants appellees.
Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, and CASTLE and KILEY, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff Robert M. Lee, Jr., pro se, is appealing from an order of the district court dismissing his action brought under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1983, 1985 and 1986 against defendants, People of the State of Illinois, City of Chicago Police Department, unknown subjects and party (or parties), Warden Frank J. Pate and others. Plaintiff was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court and before us. He appeared personally before us and orally argued his case.
Plaintiff's complaint does not state a cause of action under the Civil Rights Act against City of Chicago Police Department and People of the State of Illinois since these are not "persons" within the meaning of the Act. Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167, 191-192, 81 S.Ct. 473, 5 L.Ed.2d 492 (1961).
The district court had no jurisdiction over defendants designated in the complaint as "Unknown Subjects and Party(s)" since they were not named and served with summons and a copy of the complaint.
Pate is the only defendant named in the complaint over whom the district court had jurisdiction.
Plaintiff was incarcerated at the Illinois State Penitentiary, Joliet, Illinois, to serve a sentence of seven years for rape, pursuant to a final judgment of the state courts of Illinois. Penitentiary officials, pursuant to a penitentiary rule, took 360 letters written by plaintiff's wife, from plaintiff's possession. These letters were held at the prison for him until his release. Plaintiff's complaint alleges that enforcement of this rule, which prohibits prisoners from accumulating more than fifteen personal letters in their cells, violated his civil rights. This rule does not apply to letters pertaining to legal matters.
"Except under exceptional circumstances, internal matters in state penitentiaries are the sole concern of the states and federal courts will not inquire concerning them." United States ex rel. Knight v. Ragen, 7 Cir., 337 F.2d 425, 426 ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Roberts v. Pepersack
...materials allowed in cells are that they present a fire hazard, Carey v. Settle, 351 F.2d 483 (8th Cir. 1965); United States ex rel. Lee v. Illinois, 343 F.2d 120 (7th Cir. 1965), and a desire not to encourage jailhouse lawyers who might "exploit and dominate weaker prisoners of inferior in......
-
Sams v. New York State Board of Parole
...413 F.2d 84, 86 (3d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1046, 90 S.Ct. 696, 24 L.Ed.2d 691 (1970). 11 United States ex rel. Lee v. Illinois, 343 F.2d 120 (7th Cir. 1965); Nugent v. Sheppard, 318 F.Supp. 314, 315 (N.D. Ind. 1970); Burmeister v. New York City Police Dep't, 275 F.Supp. 690, 695......
-
Muzquiz v. City of San Antonio
...County of Philadelphia, 413 F.2d 84 (CA3, 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1046, 90 S.Ct. 696, 24 L.Ed.2d 691 (1970); U. S. ex rel. Lee v. Illinois, 343 F.2d 120 (CA7, 1965); Williford v. California, 352 F.2d 474 (CA9, 1965).4 See, e. g., Cheramie v. Tucker, 493 F.2d 586 (CA5), cert. denied, 4......
-
Gras v. Stevens, 76 Civ. 9-C.L.B.
...94 S.Ct. 2409, 40 L.Ed.2d 774 (1974); Williford v. People of California, 352 F.2d 474 (9 Cir. 1965); United States ex rel. Lee v. People of the State of Illinois, 343 F.2d 120 (7 Cir. 1965); Collins v. Moore, 441 F.2d 550, 551 (5 Cir. 1971). With respect to most of the other defendants we f......
-
Censorship of Mail: the Prisoner's Right To Communicate By Mail With the Outside World
...a prisoner topossession of 15 personal letters to be valid as a fire prevention regu-lation. United States ex rel Lee v. Illinois, 343 F. 2d 120 (7th 1965). The soundness of this decision is questioned because the rule did not apply to letters pertaining to legal matters. Therefore, if thel......