United States v. International Bldg Co

Decision Date04 May 1953
Docket NumberNo. 508,508
Citation73 S.Ct. 807,97 L.Ed. 1182,345 U.S. 502
PartiesUNITED STATES v. INTERNATIONAL BLDG. CO
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

See 345 U.S. 978, 73 S.Ct. 1120.

Mr. Philip Elman, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Mr. Malcolm I. Frank, St. Louis, Mo., for respondent.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

Respondent, a Missouri corporation, owns a leasehold of a plot of ground together with an office building erected on it. In 1942 the Commissioner assessed deficiencies against respondent for the taxable years 1933, 1938, and 1939, determining that it had claimed an excessive value as its basis for depreciating the property. These deficiencies were predicated on a basis of $385,000 amortized over the life of the lease. Respondent, who claimed a base of $860,000 amortized over a shorter period, filed petitions for review with the Tax Court. Meanwhile respondent filed a petition under ch. X of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 501 et seq. which ended in a confirmed plan of reorganization. Although the Collector filed proof of claim for the deficiencies in those proceedings, he later withdrew the claim under a stipulation that the withdrawal was 'without prejudice' and did not constitute a determination of or prejudice the rights of the United States to any taxes with respect to any year other than those involved in the claim. Shortly thereafter respondent and the Commissioner filed stipulations in the pending Tax Court proceedings stating that 'there is no deficiency in Federal income tax due' from respondent for the taxable years in question, that the tax liability for each of the years was nil, and that the jeopardy assess- ment was abated.1 The Tax Court, pursuant to the stipulation, entered formal decisions that there were no deficiencies for the taxable years in question. The Tax Court, however, held no hearing; no stipulations of fact were entered into; no briefs were filed or argument had. The issue as to the correctness of the basis of depreciation used by respondent was, however, the basis of its appeal to the Tax Court. And so, when the Commissioner in 1948 assessed deficiencies for the years 1943, 1944, and 1945, challenging once more the correctness of the basis of depreciation, respondent paid the deficiencies and brought this suit to recover, alleging inter alia that the decisions of the Tax Court for the years 1933, 1938, and 1939 were res judicata of the fact that the basis for depreciation was $860,000. The District Court held against respondent. 97 F.Supp. 595. The Court of Appeals reversed, 8 Cir., 199 F.2d 12. Because of a conflict between that decision and Trapp v. United States, 177 F.2d 1, decided by the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, we granted certiorari.

The governing principle is stated in Cromwell v. County of Sac, 94 U.S. 351, 352—353, 24 L.Ed. 195. A judgment is an absolute bar to a subsequent action on the same claim.

'But where the second action between the same parties is upon a different claim or demand, the judgment in the prior action operates as an estoppel only as to those matters in issue or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered. In all cases, therefore, where it is sought to apply the estoppel of a judgment rendered upon one cause of action to matters arising in a suit upon a different cause of action, the inquiry must always be as to the point or question actually litigated and determined in the original action; not what might have been thus litigated and determined. Only upon such matters is the judgment conclusive in another action.'

And see Tait v. Western Md. R. Co., 289 U.S. 620, 623, 53 S.Ct. 706, 707, 77 L.Ed. 1405; Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Co., 320 U.S. 661, 671, 64 S.Ct. 268, 273, 88 L.Ed. 376; Commissioner v. Sunnen, 333 U.S. 591, 597—598, 68 S.Ct. 715, 719, 92 L.Ed. 898. Estoppel by judgment, or collateral estoppel as it is often called, is applicable in the federal income...

To continue reading

Request your trial
280 cases
  • Messier v. Southbury Training School
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Connecticut
    • June 5, 2008
    ...a consent judgment "may involve a determination of questions of fact and law by the court." United States v. Int'l Bldg. Co., 345 U.S. 502, 505-6, 73 S.Ct. 807, 97 L.Ed. 1182 (1953). However, "unless a showing is made that that was the case, the judgment has no greater dignity, so far as co......
  • Smith v. Sperling
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • December 16, 1953
    ...Judgments § 71 (1942); Scott, Collateral Estoppel By Judgment, 56 Harv.L.Rev. 1, 18-22 (1942); cf. United States v. International Bldg. Co., 1953, 345 U.S. 502, 504-505, 73 S.Ct. 807; Zank v. Landon, 9 Cir., 1953, 205 F.2d 615; Sachs v. Ohio Nat. Life Ins. Co., 7 Cir., 1945, 148 F.2d 128, 1......
  • Chicago and Illinois Midland Ry. Co. v. Marsh
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Central District of Illinois
    • January 9, 1984
    ...estoppel should not be extended to consent judgments. In support of this proposition, they cite United States v. International Building Company, 345 U.S. 502, 73 S.Ct. 807, 97 L.Ed. 1182 (1953) and Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp., 349 U.S. 322, 75 S.Ct. 865, 99 L.Ed. 1122 (1955). In......
  • In re Monument Record Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Middle District of Tennessee
    • March 13, 1987
    ...Commission Act, 43 L.Ed.2d 807 (1976). 6 This is one possible statement of the holding in United States v. International Bldg. Co., 345 U.S. 502, 506, 97 L.Ed. 1182, 1188, 73 S.Ct. 807, 809, reh'g denied 345 U.S. 978, 97 L.Ed. 1392, 73 S.Ct. 1120 (1953) ("A judgment entered with the consent......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Transnational class actions and interjurisdictional preclusion.
    • United States
    • Notre Dame Law Review Vol. 86 No. 1, February 2011
    • February 1, 2011
    ...therein"). (65) See 18A WRIGHT, MILLER & COOPER, supra note 14, [section] 4443, at 265 (discussing United States v. Int'l Bldg. Co., 345 U.S. 502, 505-06 (1953)). Where, however, class members appear before the F1 court, objecting to the settlement and questioning whether or not it rele......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Antitrust Evidence Handbook
    • January 1, 2016
    ...v. Hutchison, 22 F.3d 846 (9th Cir. 1993), 159 United States v. IBM, 71 F.R.D. 376 (S.D.N.Y. 1976), 101 United States v. Int’l Bldg. Co., 345 U.S. 502 (1953), 254 United States v. Interstate Dress Carriers, Inc., 280 F.2d 52 (2d Cir. 1960), 125 United States v. Irvin, 682 F.3d 1254 (10th Ci......
  • Collateral Estoppel and Prima Facie Effect
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Antitrust Evidence Handbook
    • January 1, 2016
    ...resolved or whether the agreement of the parties was based on some collateral consideration. United States v. Int’l Bldg. Co. , 345 U.S. 502, 505 (1953) (finding tax court judgment entered with consent of parties (IRS and taxpayer) inconclusive because no matters were actually litigated and......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT