Obi v. Singletary, CC-433
Decision Date | 17 June 1977 |
Docket Number | No. CC-433,CC-433 |
Parties | 1977-1 Trade Cases P 61,501 William J. OBI and Rosie N. Obi, Appellants, v. Carl C. SINGLETARY and Annie L. Singletary, his wife, Appellees. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
David M. Wiesenfeld and Raymond J. Sweeney, Jr., Dawson, Galant, Maddox, Sulik & Nichols, Jacksonville, for appellants.
Harry Katz, Jr., Katz & Katz, Jacksonville, for appellees.
Plaintiffs Obi appeal from a Duval County circuit court judgment dismissing their contract claims against appellees Singletary for failure of the Obis' second amended complaint to state a cause of action in counts three and five. Count three sought an injunction against the Singletarys' violation of their agreement not to compete with the grocery business purchased by the Obis from the Singletarys. Count five sought damages for the Singletarys' alleged failure to insure the leased grocery premises to full value.
On October 4, 1974, the Singletarys leased to the Obis the land and building identified as "Jones Road Grocery" for a renewable five year term and sold the Obis "the business, goods and inventory known as Jones Road Grocery." Subsequently, in an addendum to the sale agreement, the Singletarys agreed:
"Seller hereby covenants and agrees that he will not engage either as a proprietor, stockholder, partner or managerial employee in any other grocery business or any such business similar in nature to Jones Road Grocery within a three (3) mile radius of Jones Road Grocery located at 1023 Jones Road, Jacksonville, Duval County, Florida."
The Obis' claim to enforce the noncompetition agreement was dismissed because the second amended complaint did not in terms allege, and the contract by which the grocery was sold did not in terms recite, that goodwill was sold. The dismissal effectively invalidates the noncompetition agreement.
Section 542.12, Florida Statutes (1975) provides:
(Emphasis added.)
Although the contract documents exhibited with the pleading did not explicitly transfer the "goodwill" associated with Jones Road Grocery, we conceive they are sufficient to raise the issue and that, when evidence of the surrounding circumstances is adduced, the factfinder may properly conclude that...
To continue reading
Request your trial