348 U.S. 960 (1955), 246, Diehl v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co.

Docket Nº:No. 246.
Citation:348 U.S. 960, 75 S.Ct. 521, 99 L.Ed. 749
Party Name:Paul W. DIEHL, Jr., petitioner, v. LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD CO. et al.
Case Date:March 14, 1955
Court:United States Supreme Court
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 960

348 U.S. 960 (1955)

75 S.Ct. 521, 99 L.Ed. 749

Paul W. DIEHL, Jr., petitioner,

v.

LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD CO. et al.

No. 246.

United States Supreme Court.

March 14, 1955

COUNSEL

Mr. Harry Montgomery Leet (Mr. Sheldon E. Bernstein, on the brief), for petitioner.

Mr. Richard R. Lyman (Messrs. Clarence M. Mulholland and Edward J. Hickey, Jr., on the brief), for respondents System Federation No. 96, Railway Employes' Department, A. F. of L., and others.

[75 S.Ct. 522] Messrs. Thomas Price Mikell and Harry E. Sprogell, for

Page 961

respondent Lehigh Valley Railroad Co.

Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Burger and Mr. Samuel D. Slade, for the United States, as amicus curiae.

OPINION

On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the facts disclosed in the opinion of the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 211 F.2d 95, the applicable Acts of Congress, and the opinion of this Court in Oakley v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co., 338 U.S. 278, 70 S.Ct. 119, 94 L.Ed. 87, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

Mr. Justice REED dissents for the reasons...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP