348 U.S. 960 (1955), 246, Diehl v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co.
|Docket Nº:||No. 246.|
|Citation:||348 U.S. 960, 75 S.Ct. 521, 99 L.Ed. 749|
|Party Name:||Paul W. DIEHL, Jr., petitioner, v. LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD CO. et al.|
|Case Date:||March 14, 1955|
|Court:||United States Supreme Court|
Mr. Harry Montgomery Leet (Mr. Sheldon E. Bernstein, on the brief), for petitioner.
Mr. Richard R. Lyman (Messrs. Clarence M. Mulholland and Edward J. Hickey, Jr., on the brief), for respondents System Federation No. 96, Railway Employes' Department, A. F. of L., and others.
[75 S.Ct. 522] Messrs. Thomas Price Mikell and Harry E. Sprogell, for
respondent Lehigh Valley Railroad Co.
Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Burger and Mr. Samuel D. Slade, for the United States, as amicus curiae.
On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Upon the facts disclosed in the opinion of the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 211 F.2d 95, the applicable Acts of Congress, and the opinion of this Court in Oakley v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co., 338 U.S. 278, 70 S.Ct. 119, 94 L.Ed. 87, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed.
Mr. Justice REED dissents for the reasons...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP