35 F. 248 (S.D.Cal. 1888), Hughes v. Cawthorn
|Citation:||35 F. 248|
|Party Name:||HUGHES v. CAWTHORN.|
|Case Date:||January 09, 1888|
|Court:||United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit|
Wells, Van Dyke & Lee, for plaintiff.
Williams & McKinley, for defendant.
There is but a single question in this case, that relates to the boundaries of the Rancho Tujunga, a Mexican grant, confirmed and patented by the government of the United States. At the trial it was conceded by the respective parties that if the land in controversy is to the south of the northerly line of the rancho, the plaintiff is entitled to recover; otherwise not. There is no dispute in respect to the starting point of the Tujunga, which is also the third station of the adjoining Rancho Ex-Mission of San Fernando, and is situated at the mouth of a canada on the south base of the San Fernando mountains. From this point of beginning, the line, according to the patent, runs along the base of the San Fernando mountains a given course and distance to a stake station; thence a certain other course and distance to a stake station; thence a certain other course and distance to a stake station; thence a certain other course and distance to a stake station on the south base of a mountain, opposite which point, it is declared, the Tujunga valley bearing east and west, is about 50 chains wide; thence a certain other course and distance to 'a sycamore six inches in diameter, marked 'T 8 station;" thence 'south 11 degrees 45 feet east, eleven chains, to Tujunga creek, 20 links wide, course west, thirty-three chains to a stake station;' thence 'south 47 degrees 30 feet east, at seven chains, across a dry arroyo, 30 links wide, course west, thirty-seven
chains, to a stake station;' thence 'south 22 degrees east ninety-six chains to a stake station;' thence 'south 80 degrees east, ninety-six chains, to a gray granite rock, eighteen inches long, twelve inches wide, and ten inches thick, station, on the south-west slope of a high mountain;' thence, etc. That there is a mistake somewhere in this description is admitted on both sides. If, commencing at the starting point, the line be run according to the courses and distances given, it will not follow the base of the San Fernando mountains, as in the patent it is declared to do, but so far deflects into the valley as that, when station 6 is reached, it is fixed at a point, not, as declared in the patent, on the south base of a mountain, but 18 chains therefrom in...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP