Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litigation, In re

Decision Date17 October 1994
Docket NumberNo. 86-07421,No. 86-02669,Nos. 92-1995,No. 86-07416,No. 87-05269,No. 86-05886,No. 86-07417,No. 86-07420,No. 86-07419,No. 86-07561,No. 87-00712,No. 86-05277,No. 86-07422,No. 86-07414,No. 86-07418,No. 86-07415,No. 86-02229,No. 86-02235,No. 87-02874,86-02229,86-02235,86-02669,86-05277,86-05886,86-07414,86-07415,86-07416,86-07417,86-07418,86-07419,86-07420,86-07421,86-07422,86-07561,87-00712,87-02874,87-05269,s. 92-1995
Citation35 F.3d 717
Parties, 30 Fed.R.Serv.3d 644, 40 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 379 In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION. Mabel BROWN, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak"); and Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail") v. UNITED STATES of America; Roy F. Weston, Inc.; and OH Materials Company; and General Electric Company; and the Budd Company; and Westinghouse Electric Corporation; Monsanto Co.; Penn Central Corporation, Mabel Brown, Appellant (D.C.Civ.). In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION. George Albert BURRELL and Priscilla Etheridge Burrell, in their own right, and George Albert Burrell and Priscilla Etheridge Burrell, as parents and natural guardian of Amber Shardai Burrell, a minor, and George Albert Burrell, as parent and natural guardian of Andre Walker, a minor, and Priscilla Etheridge Burrell, as parent and natural guardian of Bobby George Albert Christian Burrell, a minor v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ("SEPTA"); and National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak"); and Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail") v. UNITED STATES of America; Monsanto Company; General Electric Company; the Budd Company; Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION, George Burrell, Priscilla Burrell, Amber Burrell and Monica Hilton, Appellants (D.C.Civ.). In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION. Wallace Darryl CUMMINS v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ("SEPTA"); and National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak"); and Consolidated Rail Corporation, ("Conrail") v. UNITED STATES of America; and General Electric Company; The Budd Company; Westinghouse Electric Corporation; Monsanto Company, Wallace D. Cummins, Appellant (D.C.Civ.). In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION. K. Louise JONES, Administratrix of the Estate of Harvey N. Jones, Jr., Deceased and K. Louise Jones as Personal Representative of
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit

Amber Burrell and Monica Hilton, Appellants

In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.

Wallace Darryl CUMMINS

v.

SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

("SEPTA"); and National Railroad Passenger

Corporation ("Amtrak"); and

Consolidated Rail Corporation,

("Conrail")

v.

UNITED STATES of America; and General Electric Company;

The Budd Company; Westinghouse Electric

Corporation; Monsanto Company, Wallace

D. Cummins, Appellant

(D.C.Civ. No. 86-02669).

In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.

K. Louise JONES, Administratrix of the Estate of Harvey N.

Jones, Jr., Deceased and K. Louise Jones as

Personal Representative of Harvey N.

Jones, Jr., and K. Louise

Jones in her own Right

v.

SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger

Corporation ("Amtrak"); Consolidated

Rail Corporation, ("Conrail")

v.

UNITED STATES of America; City of Philadelphia; Monsanto

Company; General Electric Company; the Budd Company; and

Westinghouse Electric Corporation, K. Louise Jones and

Harvey Jones, Appellants (D.C.Civ. No. 86-05277).

In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.

James LAMENT, individually and on behalf of all others

similarly situated

v.

SEPTA; Amtrak and Conrail;

v.

PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION; United States of America; City

of Philadelphia; Monsanto Co.; General Electric Co.;

Budd Co., and Westinghouse Electric Corporation, James

Lament, Appellant (D.C.Civ. No. 86-05886).

In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.

Christopher S. BROWN; Jacqueline M. Brown, h/w

v.

MONSANTO COMPANY; Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation

Authority ("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger

Corporation; Consolidated Rail

Corporation ("Conrail")

v.

PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION; United States of America; City

of Philadelphia; General Electric Company; The Budd

Company; Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Christopher

Brown and Jacqueline Michelle Brown, Appellants (D.C.Civ.

No. 86-07414).

In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.

Cathlene BROWN, Appellant,

v.

MONSANTO COMPANY; Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation

Authority ("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger

Corporation ("Amtrak"); Consolidated

Rail Corporation ("Conrail")

v.

UNITED STATES of America; City of Philadelphia; General

Electric Company; the Budd Company; Westinghouse

Electric Corporation

v.

PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION (D.C.Civ. No. 86-07415).

In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.

Craig A. BROWN and Catherine D. Brown, h/w

v.

MONSANTO COMPANY; Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation

Authority ("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger

Corporation ("Amtrak"); and

Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail")

v.

UNITED STATES of America; Penn Central Corporation; and

City of Philadelphia; General Electric Co.; the Budd Co.;

and Westinghouse Electric Corp., Craig Brown, Appellant

(D.C.Civ. No. 86-07416).

In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.

Margherita BARBETTA, Appellant

v.

MONSANTO COMPANY; Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation

Authority ("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger

Corporation ("Amtrak"); and

Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail")

v.

UNITED STATES of America; and City of Philadelphia; the

General Electric Company; and the Budd Company;

and Westinghouse Electric Corporation

v.

PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION (D.C.Civ. No. 86-07417).

In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.

Mary Retta JOHNSON, Appellant

v.

MONSANTO COMPANY; Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation

Authority ("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger

Corporation ("Amtrak"); and

Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail")

v.

UNITED STATES of America; and the City of Philadelphia;

and General Electric Company; the Budd Company;

and Westinghouse Electric Corporation;

and Penn Central Corp.

(D.C.Civ. No. 86-07418).

In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.

Celeste BROWN, Appellant,

v.

MONSANTO COMPANY; Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation

Authority ("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger

Corporation ("Amtrak"); and

Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail")

v.

UNITED STATES of America; City of Philadelphia; and

General Electric Company; the Budd Company;

Westinghouse Electric Corporation

(D.C.Civ. No. 86-07419).

In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.

Clemmon L. BROWN

v.

MONSANTO COMPANY; Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation

Authority ("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger

Corporation ("Amtrak"); and

Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail")

v.

UNITED STATES of America; City of Philadelphia; and

General Electric Company; the Budd Company; and

Westinghouse Electric Corporation; and Penn Central

Corporation, Clemmon Brown, Appellant (D.C.Civ. No. 86-07420).

In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.

Cloyd H. BROWN

v.

MONSANTO COMPANY; Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation

Authority ("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger

Corporation ("Amtrak"); and

Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail")

v.

UNITED STATES of America; City of Philadelphia; General

Electric Company; the Budd Company; Westinghouse Electric

Corporation; Penn Central Corporation, Cloyd Brown,

Appellant (D.C.Civ. No. 86-07421).

In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.

Curtis BROWN, Appellant,

v.

MONSANTO COMPANY; Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation

Authority ("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger

Corporation ("Amtrak"); and

Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail")

v.

UNITED STATES of America; City of Philadelphia

v.

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; and the Budd Company; and

Westinghouse Electric Company; Penn Central Corp.

(D.C.Civ. No. 86-07422).

In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.

John INGRAM, Sr., and Patricia Ingram, in their own right

and as parents and natural guardians of John

Ingram, Jr.; and April Ingram in her own right

v.

SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger Corporation

("Amtrak"); and Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail");

and Monsanto Company ("Monsanto"); and General Electric

Company ("GE"); and City of Philadelphia ("Philadelphia")

v.

UNITED STATES of America; the Budd Company; Westinghouse

Electric Corporation; Penn Central Corporation, John

Ingram, Sr. (and as representative of decedent, Patricia

Ingram), John Ingram, Jr., Patricia Ingram and April Ingram

Robinson-Ray, Appellants (D.C.Civ. No. 86-07561).

In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.

Mary Alice KNIGHT, Appellant

v.

SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger Corporation

("Amtrak"); and Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail");

and Monsanto Company ("Monsanto"); and General Electric

Company ("GE"); and City of Philadelphia ("Philadelphia")

v.

UNITED STATES of America; the Budd Company; Westinghouse

Electric Corporation; Penn Central Corporation

(D.C.Civ. No. 87-00712).

In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.

William BUTLER; Theresa Butler; Marvin L. Simpson; Allen

K. Simpson; Karen R. Simpson; Donald E. Simpson;

and Bryan M. Jackson

v.

SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger

Corporation ("Amtrak"); and

Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail")

v.

UNITED STATES of America; City of Philadelphia; Monsanto

Company; General Electric Company; The Budd Company;

Westinghouse Electric Corporation; Penn Central

Corporation, William Butler, Theresa Butler, Bryan Jackson,

Allen Simpson, Donald Simpson, Karen Simpson and Marvin

Simpson, Appellants, (D.C. Civ. No. 87-02874).

In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.

Matthew CUNNINGHAM; and Bessie Cunningham, Appellants,

v.

MONSANTO COMPANY; and Southeastern Pennsylvania

Transportation Authority ("SEPTA"); and National

Railroad Passenger Corporation

("Amtrak"); and Consolidated

Rail Corporation ("Conrail")

v.

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; the Budd Company; Westinghouse

Electric Corporation; Penn Central Corporation,

Third-Party Defendants (D.C. Civ. No. 87-05269).

Nos. 92-1995 thru 92-1997, 92-1999 thru 92-2011, 92-2014 and

92-2016.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued Oct. 26, 1993.

Decided Aug. 31, 1994.

As Amended Oct. 17, 1994.

Page 730

Arnold E. Cohen, Klehr, Harrison, Harvey, Branzburg, Ellers & Weir, Joseph C. Kohn, Myles H. Malman, Martin J. D'Urso (argued), Kohn, Nast & Graf, Philadelphia, PA, for appellants Mabel Brown (1995); George Burrell, Priscilla Burrell, Amber Burrell, and Monica Hilton (1996); Wallace D. Cummins (1997); K. Louise Jones and Estate of Harvey Jones (1999); James Lament (2000); John Ingram, Sr., Patricia Ingram, April Ingram Robinson and John Ingram, Jr. (2010); Mary Knight (2011); William Butler, Theresa Butler, Marvin Simpson, Alan Simpson, Karen Simpson, Donald Simpson...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1829 cases
  • Krueger v. Wyeth, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • 1 d1 Julho d1 2019
    ... ... is lower than the merits standard of correctness") (quoting In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litig. , 35 F.3d 717, 744 (3d Cir. 1994) ). Reliable ... ...
  • Yarchak v. Trek Bicycle Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey
    • 25 d2 Junho d2 2002
    ... ... may have a fair opportunity to defend, thus preventing the litigation of stale claims, and (2) to penalize dilatoriness and serve as a measure ... and particular disputed factual issues in the case." In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litig., 35 F.3d 717, 741-743 (3d Cir.1994) (" Paoli II ") ... ...
  • Com. v. Sok
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • 25 d1 Agosto d1 1997
    ... ... See In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litig., 35 F.3d 717, 749 (3d Cir.1994), cert. denied sub ... ...
  • Dougan v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • 14 d1 Setembro d1 2020
    ... ... 37 medical monitoring test outlined in In re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB Litigation , 916 F.2d 829, 852 (3d Cir. 1990), cert ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
  • Assessing Expert Methodology: Daubert: in the Third Circuit and the District of New Jersey
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • 19 d0 Setembro d0 2004
    ...(3rd Cir. June 25, 2003); Gibbs v. Gibbs, 210 F.3d 491 (5th Cir. 2000); Volk v. United States, 57 F. Supp. 2d 888 (N.D. Cal. 1999). 35 F.3d 717, 739 (3rd Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1190 180 F. Supp. 2d at 597. Calhoun v. Yamaha Motor Corp., 350 F.3d 316 (3rd Cir. 2003) at 321; Schne......
  • Taking A Science Expert Deposition To Set Up A Daubert Motion
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • 1 d1 Fevereiro d1 2016
    ...where there was "simply too great an analytical gap between the data and the opinion proffered"); In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litig., 35 F3d 717, 765 (3d Cir. 1994) (excluding expert testimony where the expert "place[d] heavy reliance on unreliable . . . In exploring the core Daubert factors,......
  • Unanimous Approval Received For Amendments To Federal Rule Of Evidence 702: Testimony Of Expert Witnesses
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • 17 d5 Junho d5 2022
    ...they only have to demonstrate by a preponderance of evidence that their opinions are reliable. . . ." In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litig., 35 F.3d 717, 744 (3d Cir. 1994) (emphasis in Also, by noting that the proponent must prove reliability by a preponderance of the evidence, the amendment de......
54 books & journal articles
  • Attacking the Opposing Expert
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Qualifying & Attacking Expert Witnesses - 2018 Contents
    • 4 d6 Agosto d6 2018
    ...relevant, that is, whether it will “assist the trier of fact.” Brown v. Southeastern Pa. Transp. Auth. (In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litig.), 35 F. 3d 717 (3d Cir. 1994) ( Paoli II ) held that in addition to reliability, the expert’s testimony must assist the trier of fact. Admissibility depen......
  • Witness
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Trial Objections
    • 5 d4 Maio d4 2022
    ...for unlawful possession of a firearm; the “firearm” in question was a pipe bomb. CHEMICAL EXPERT In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litig. , 35 F.3d 717, 775 (3d Cir. 1994). District court abused its discretion in determining that a witness was not qualified to testify as an expert in defense of a r......
  • Presenting Your Expert at Trial and Arbitration
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Qualifying & Attacking Expert Witnesses - 2020 Contents
    • 4 d2 Agosto d2 2020
    ...affirmed the trial court’s order for summary judgment. Brown v. Southeastern Pa. Transp. Auth. (In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litig.) , 35 F.3d 717, 743-744 (3d Cir. 1994), involved actions by 38 persons who sought damages resulting from exposure to PCB. The trial court granted summary judgment......
  • Attacking the Opposing Expert
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Qualifying & Attacking Expert Witnesses
    • 4 d3 Maio d3 2022
    ...relevant, that is, whether it will “assist the trier of fact.” Brown v. Southeastern Pa. Transp. Auth. (In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litig.), 35 F. 3d 717 (3d Cir. 1994) ( Paoli II ) held that in addition to reliability, the expert’s testimony must assist the trier of fact. Admissibility depen......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT