Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litigation, In re
Decision Date | 17 October 1994 |
Docket Number | No. 86-07421,No. 86-02669,Nos. 92-1995,No. 86-07416,No. 87-05269,No. 86-05886,No. 86-07417,No. 86-07420,No. 86-07419,No. 86-07561,No. 87-00712,No. 86-05277,No. 86-07422,No. 86-07414,No. 86-07418,No. 86-07415,No. 86-02229,No. 86-02235,No. 87-02874,86-02229,86-02235,86-02669,86-05277,86-05886,86-07414,86-07415,86-07416,86-07417,86-07418,86-07419,86-07420,86-07421,86-07422,86-07561,87-00712,87-02874,87-05269,s. 92-1995 |
Citation | 35 F.3d 717 |
Parties | , 30 Fed.R.Serv.3d 644, 40 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 379 In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION. Mabel BROWN, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak"); and Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail") v. UNITED STATES of America; Roy F. Weston, Inc.; and OH Materials Company; and General Electric Company; and the Budd Company; and Westinghouse Electric Corporation; Monsanto Co.; Penn Central Corporation, Mabel Brown, Appellant (D.C.Civ.). In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION. George Albert BURRELL and Priscilla Etheridge Burrell, in their own right, and George Albert Burrell and Priscilla Etheridge Burrell, as parents and natural guardian of Amber Shardai Burrell, a minor, and George Albert Burrell, as parent and natural guardian of Andre Walker, a minor, and Priscilla Etheridge Burrell, as parent and natural guardian of Bobby George Albert Christian Burrell, a minor v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ("SEPTA"); and National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak"); and Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail") v. UNITED STATES of America; Monsanto Company; General Electric Company; the Budd Company; Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION, George Burrell, Priscilla Burrell, Amber Burrell and Monica Hilton, Appellants (D.C.Civ.). In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION. Wallace Darryl CUMMINS v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ("SEPTA"); and National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak"); and Consolidated Rail Corporation, ("Conrail") v. UNITED STATES of America; and General Electric Company; The Budd Company; Westinghouse Electric Corporation; Monsanto Company, Wallace D. Cummins, Appellant (D.C.Civ.). In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION. K. Louise JONES, Administratrix of the Estate of Harvey N. Jones, Jr., Deceased and K. Louise Jones as Personal Representative of |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit |
Amber Burrell and Monica Hilton, Appellants
In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.
Wallace Darryl CUMMINS
v.
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
("SEPTA"); and National Railroad Passenger
Corporation ("Amtrak"); and
Consolidated Rail Corporation,
("Conrail")
v.
UNITED STATES of America; and General Electric Company;
The Budd Company; Westinghouse Electric
Corporation; Monsanto Company, Wallace
D. Cummins, Appellant
In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.
K. Louise JONES, Administratrix of the Estate of Harvey N.
Jones, Jr., Deceased and K. Louise Jones as
Personal Representative of Harvey N.
Jones, Jr., and K. Louise
Jones in her own Right
v.
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger
Corporation ("Amtrak"); Consolidated
Rail Corporation, ("Conrail")
v.
UNITED STATES of America; City of Philadelphia; Monsanto
Company; General Electric Company; the Budd Company; and
Westinghouse Electric Corporation, K. Louise Jones and
Harvey Jones, Appellants (D.C.Civ. No. 86-05277).
In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.
James LAMENT, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated
v.
SEPTA; Amtrak and Conrail;
v.
PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION; United States of America; City
of Philadelphia; Monsanto Co.; General Electric Co.;
Budd Co., and Westinghouse Electric Corporation, James
Lament, Appellant (D.C.Civ. No. 86-05886).
In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.
Christopher S. BROWN; Jacqueline M. Brown, h/w
v.
MONSANTO COMPANY; Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation
Authority ("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger
Corporation; Consolidated Rail
Corporation ("Conrail")
v.
PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION; United States of America; City
of Philadelphia; General Electric Company; The Budd
Company; Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Christopher
Brown and Jacqueline Michelle Brown, Appellants (D.C.Civ.
In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.
Cathlene BROWN, Appellant,
v.
MONSANTO COMPANY; Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation
Authority ("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger
Corporation ("Amtrak"); Consolidated
Rail Corporation ("Conrail")
v.
UNITED STATES of America; City of Philadelphia; General
Electric Company; the Budd Company; Westinghouse
Electric Corporation
v.
PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION (D.C.Civ. No. 86-07415).
In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.
Craig A. BROWN and Catherine D. Brown, h/w
v.
MONSANTO COMPANY; Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation
Authority ("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger
Corporation ("Amtrak"); and
Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail")
v.
UNITED STATES of America; Penn Central Corporation; and
City of Philadelphia; General Electric Co.; the Budd Co.;
and Westinghouse Electric Corp., Craig Brown, Appellant
In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.
Margherita BARBETTA, Appellant
v.
MONSANTO COMPANY; Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation
Authority ("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger
Corporation ("Amtrak"); and
Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail")
v.
UNITED STATES of America; and City of Philadelphia; the
General Electric Company; and the Budd Company;
and Westinghouse Electric Corporation
v.
PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION (D.C.Civ. No. 86-07417).
In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.
Mary Retta JOHNSON, Appellant
v.
MONSANTO COMPANY; Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation
Authority ("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger
Corporation ("Amtrak"); and
Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail")
v.
UNITED STATES of America; and the City of Philadelphia;
and General Electric Company; the Budd Company;
and Westinghouse Electric Corporation;
and Penn Central Corp.
In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.
Celeste BROWN, Appellant,
v.
MONSANTO COMPANY; Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation
Authority ("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger
Corporation ("Amtrak"); and
Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail")
v.
UNITED STATES of America; City of Philadelphia; and
General Electric Company; the Budd Company;
Westinghouse Electric Corporation
In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.
Clemmon L. BROWN
v.
MONSANTO COMPANY; Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation
Authority ("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger
Corporation ("Amtrak"); and
Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail")
v.
UNITED STATES of America; City of Philadelphia; and
General Electric Company; the Budd Company; and
Westinghouse Electric Corporation; and Penn Central
Corporation, Clemmon Brown, Appellant (D.C.Civ. No. 86-07420).
In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.
Cloyd H. BROWN
v.
MONSANTO COMPANY; Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation
Authority ("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger
Corporation ("Amtrak"); and
Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail")
v.
UNITED STATES of America; City of Philadelphia; General
Electric Company; the Budd Company; Westinghouse Electric
Corporation; Penn Central Corporation, Cloyd Brown,
Appellant (D.C.Civ. No. 86-07421).
In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.
Curtis BROWN, Appellant,
v.
MONSANTO COMPANY; Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation
Authority ("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger
Corporation ("Amtrak"); and
Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail")
v.
UNITED STATES of America; City of Philadelphia
v.
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; and the Budd Company; and
Westinghouse Electric Company; Penn Central Corp.
In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.
John INGRAM, Sr., and Patricia Ingram, in their own right
and as parents and natural guardians of John
Ingram, Jr.; and April Ingram in her own right
v.
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger Corporation
("Amtrak"); and Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail");
and Monsanto Company ("Monsanto"); and General Electric
Company ("GE"); and City of Philadelphia ("Philadelphia")
v.
UNITED STATES of America; the Budd Company; Westinghouse
Electric Corporation; Penn Central Corporation, John
Ingram, Sr. (and as representative of decedent, Patricia
Ingram), John Ingram, Jr., Patricia Ingram and April Ingram
Robinson-Ray, Appellants (D.C.Civ. No. 86-07561).
In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.
Mary Alice KNIGHT, Appellant
v.
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger Corporation
("Amtrak"); and Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail");
and Monsanto Company ("Monsanto"); and General Electric
Company ("GE"); and City of Philadelphia ("Philadelphia")
v.
UNITED STATES of America; the Budd Company; Westinghouse
Electric Corporation; Penn Central Corporation
In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.
William BUTLER; Theresa Butler; Marvin L. Simpson; Allen
K. Simpson; Karen R. Simpson; Donald E. Simpson;
and Bryan M. Jackson
v.
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
("SEPTA"); National Railroad Passenger
Corporation ("Amtrak"); and
Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail")
v.
UNITED STATES of America; City of Philadelphia; Monsanto
Company; General Electric Company; The Budd Company;
Westinghouse Electric Corporation; Penn Central
Corporation, William Butler, Theresa Butler, Bryan Jackson,
Allen Simpson, Donald Simpson, Karen Simpson and Marvin
Simpson, Appellants, (D.C. Civ. No. 87-02874).
In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION.
Matthew CUNNINGHAM; and Bessie Cunningham, Appellants,
v.
MONSANTO COMPANY; and Southeastern Pennsylvania
Transportation Authority ("SEPTA"); and National
Railroad Passenger Corporation
("Amtrak"); and Consolidated
Rail Corporation ("Conrail")
v.
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; the Budd Company; Westinghouse
Electric Corporation; Penn Central Corporation,
Third-Party Defendants (D.C. Civ. No. 87-05269).
Nos. 92-1995 thru 92-1997, 92-1999 thru 92-2011, 92-2014 and
92-2016.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued Oct. 26, 1993.
Decided Aug. 31, 1994.
As Amended Oct. 17, 1994.
Arnold E. Cohen, Klehr, Harrison, Harvey, Branzburg, Ellers & Weir, Joseph C. Kohn, Myles H. Malman, Martin J. D'Urso (argued), Kohn, Nast & Graf, Philadelphia, PA, for appellants Mabel Brown (1995); George Burrell, Priscilla Burrell, Amber Burrell, and Monica Hilton (1996); Wallace D. Cummins (1997); K. Louise Jones and Estate of Harvey Jones (1999); James Lament (2000); John Ingram, Sr., Patricia Ingram, April Ingram Robinson and John Ingram, Jr. (2010); Mary Knight (2011); William Butler, Theresa Butler, Marvin Simpson, Alan Simpson, Karen Simpson, Donald Simpson...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Krueger v. Wyeth, Inc.
... ... is lower than the merits standard of correctness") (quoting In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litig. , 35 F.3d 717, 744 (3d Cir. 1994) ). Reliable ... ...
-
Yarchak v. Trek Bicycle Corp.
... ... may have a fair opportunity to defend, thus preventing the litigation of stale claims, and (2) to penalize dilatoriness and serve as a measure ... and particular disputed factual issues in the case." In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litig., 35 F.3d 717, 741-743 (3d Cir.1994) (" Paoli II ") ... ...
-
Com. v. Sok
... ... See In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litig., 35 F.3d 717, 749 (3d Cir.1994), cert. denied sub ... ...
-
Dougan v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp.
... ... 37 medical monitoring test outlined in In re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB Litigation , 916 F.2d 829, 852 (3d Cir. 1990), cert ... ...
-
Assessing Expert Methodology: Daubert: in the Third Circuit and the District of New Jersey
...(3rd Cir. June 25, 2003); Gibbs v. Gibbs, 210 F.3d 491 (5th Cir. 2000); Volk v. United States, 57 F. Supp. 2d 888 (N.D. Cal. 1999). 35 F.3d 717, 739 (3rd Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1190 180 F. Supp. 2d at 597. Calhoun v. Yamaha Motor Corp., 350 F.3d 316 (3rd Cir. 2003) at 321; Schne......
-
Taking A Science Expert Deposition To Set Up A Daubert Motion
...where there was "simply too great an analytical gap between the data and the opinion proffered"); In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litig., 35 F3d 717, 765 (3d Cir. 1994) (excluding expert testimony where the expert "place[d] heavy reliance on unreliable . . . In exploring the core Daubert factors,......
-
Unanimous Approval Received For Amendments To Federal Rule Of Evidence 702: Testimony Of Expert Witnesses
...they only have to demonstrate by a preponderance of evidence that their opinions are reliable. . . ." In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litig., 35 F.3d 717, 744 (3d Cir. 1994) (emphasis in Also, by noting that the proponent must prove reliability by a preponderance of the evidence, the amendment de......
-
Attacking the Opposing Expert
...relevant, that is, whether it will “assist the trier of fact.” Brown v. Southeastern Pa. Transp. Auth. (In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litig.), 35 F. 3d 717 (3d Cir. 1994) ( Paoli II ) held that in addition to reliability, the expert’s testimony must assist the trier of fact. Admissibility depen......
-
Witness
...for unlawful possession of a firearm; the “firearm” in question was a pipe bomb. CHEMICAL EXPERT In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litig. , 35 F.3d 717, 775 (3d Cir. 1994). District court abused its discretion in determining that a witness was not qualified to testify as an expert in defense of a r......
-
Presenting Your Expert at Trial and Arbitration
...affirmed the trial court’s order for summary judgment. Brown v. Southeastern Pa. Transp. Auth. (In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litig.) , 35 F.3d 717, 743-744 (3d Cir. 1994), involved actions by 38 persons who sought damages resulting from exposure to PCB. The trial court granted summary judgment......
-
Attacking the Opposing Expert
...relevant, that is, whether it will “assist the trier of fact.” Brown v. Southeastern Pa. Transp. Auth. (In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litig.), 35 F. 3d 717 (3d Cir. 1994) ( Paoli II ) held that in addition to reliability, the expert’s testimony must assist the trier of fact. Admissibility depen......