Genio v. United States
| Decision Date | 02 November 1965 |
| Docket Number | No. 22183.,22183. |
| Citation | 352 F.2d 304 |
| Parties | Fred Del GENIO, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Fred Del Genio, pro se.
Ernest Morgan, U. S. Atty., Reese L. Harrison, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for appellee.
Before BROWN and COLEMAN, Circuit Judges, and MORGAN, District Judge.
This is an appeal from the dismissal of a Section 2255 proceeding. In the original trial in the United States District Court, the petitioner, along with others, was convicted of transporting and conspiring to transport in interstate commerce falsely made, forged and counterfeited securities. A motion for a new trial was given an exhaustive evidentiary hearing covering the identical matters again asserted in the Section 2255 petition. The motion for new trial was denied and on appeal to this Court, the conviction was unanimously affirmed. Popeko v. United States, 294 F.2d 168.
As to the instant proceedings, the District Court conclusively determined that appellant's motion to vacate did not raise any new matters but merely reasserted issues which had been previously considered and decided by the trial court and unanimously affirmed by this Court.
Our review of the record compels us to agree with the findings of the District Court.
Consequently, this appeal is without merit and the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Medrano v. United States, 315 F.2d 361 (9 Cir. 1963); Davis v. United States, 311 F.2d 495 (7 Cir. 1963), certiorari denied 374 U.S. 846, 83 S.Ct. 1906, 10 L.Ed.2d 1067; United States v. Crawley, 309 F.2d 155 (4 Cir. 1962).
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
U.S. v. Cisneros
...re-attacked collaterally pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Vernell v. United States, 559 F.2d 963, 964 (5th Cir.1977); Del Genio v. United States, 352 F.2d 304 (5th Cir.1965). IV. Conclusion With the few exceptions noted above, the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted. T......
-
Bearden v. United States
...fully and finally litigated in the proceedings leading to judgment of conviction and direct appeal therefrom. Del Genio v. United States, 5 Cir. 1965, 352 F.2d 304 (per curiam); compare Porter v. United States, 5 Cir. 1962, 298 F.2d 461, Applying the above approach, we conclude that the "pr......
-
U.S. v. Sanders, 82-2520
...Vernell v. United States, 559 F.2d 963 (5th Cir.1977); United States v. Natelli, 553 F.2d 5 (2d Cir.1977); Del Genio v. United States, 352 F.2d 304 (5th Cir.1965). Although the appellant in this case has attempted to couch his arguments in different terms than those previously used, these i......
-
Zimmerman v. Spears, s. 77-2209
...to impose upon us such a "purposeless duplication." See Blackwell v. United States, 429 F.2d 514, 516 (5th Cir. 1970); Genio v. United States, 352 F.2d 304 (5th Cir. 1965). Accordingly, we affirm Chief Judge Brown's denial in No. At this point in this litigation, it is altogether fitting an......