Gordon v. State of Texas

Decision Date13 January 1958
Docket NumberNo. 71,71
Citation355 U.S. 369,78 S.Ct. 363,2 L.Ed.2d 352
PartiesI. N. GORDON, appellant, v. STATE OF TEXAS
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Mr. B. R. Stewart, for appellant.

Mr. C. K. Richards, Asst. Atty. Gen. of Texas (Mr. Will Wilson, Atty. Gen., on the brief), for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed. Twenty-first Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Carter v. Virginia, 321 U.S. 131, 64 S.Ct. 464, 88 L.Ed. 605.

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Epstein v. Lordi
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey
    • December 14, 1966
    ...U.S. 124, 84 S.Ct. 1657 (1963); c. f. Duckworth v. State of Arkansas, 314 U.S. 390, 62 S.Ct. 311 (1941); Gordon v. State of Texas, 355 U.S. 369, 78 S.Ct. 363, 2 L.Ed.2d 352 (1958) per curiam; and see Note, Evolving Scope of State Power Under the Twenty-first Amendment, supra, pp. The status......
  • Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corporation
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • June 1, 1964
    ...separate concurrences, relying upon the Twenty-first Amendment. 321 U.S., at 138, 139, 64 S.Ct., at 468, 469. Cf. Gordon v. Texas, 355 U.S. 369, 78 S.Ct. 363, 2 L.Ed.2d 352, upholding a similar state statute in a per curiam citing both the Twenty-first Amendment and Carter v. Commonwealth o......
  • Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • December 27, 1962
    ...state." 321 U.S. at 137-138, 64 S.Ct. at 468. The most recent Supreme Court decision on the point is Gordon v. Texas, 355 U.S. 369, 78 S.Ct. 363, 2 L.Ed.2d 352 (1958), in which the facts closely resembled those in Carter. The defendant Gordon had entered Texas from Mexico and was en route t......
  • American Travelers Club, Inc. v. Hostetter
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • June 24, 1963
    ...are numerous in which the Supreme Court has held the Amendment applicable to "wet" and "semi-wet" states. See Gordon v. Texas, 1958, 355 U.S. 369, 78 S.Ct. 363, 2 L.Ed.2d 352, affirming, 166 Tex.Cr.R. 24, 310 S.W.2d 328; Ziffrin, Inc. v. Reeves, supra 308 U.S. 132, 60 S.Ct. 163, 84 L.Ed. 12......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT