Kovrak v. Ginsburg Iii
Decision Date | 20 October 1958 |
Docket Number | No. 266,266 |
Parties | Stephen J. KOVRAK, appellant, v. S. Regen GINSBURG, Chairman, Robert F. Lehman, George P. Williams, III, etc |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Messrs. Filindo B. Masino and William B. Ball, for appellant.
Mr. Robert W. Lees, for appellees.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
To continue reading
Request your trial46 cases
- Palmer v. Thompson
-
Leis v. Flynt
...in another. See Ginsburg v. Kovrak, 392 Pa. 143, 139 A.2d 889, appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question, 358 U.S. 52, 79 S.Ct. 95, 3 L.Ed.2d 46 (1958). Accordingly, because Fahringer and Cambria did not possess a cognizable property interest within the terms of the Fourteen......
- United States v. Guest
- Palmer v. Thompson
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Don't Worry, I'll Be Right Back: Temporary Absences of Counsel During Criminal Trials and the Rule of Automatic Reversal
...unfair, we said, where the accused is denied the presence of counsel at "a critical stage," a phrase we used in Hamilton v. Alabama, 358 U.S. 52, 54 (1961), and White v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 59, 60 (1963) (percuriam), to denote a step of a criminal proceeding, such as arraignment, that held s......